- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:11 am to PortCityTiger24
OIC
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:13 am to Toula
+1 win option for the win
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:27 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Head-to-Head extra Win/Loss - Standings based on head-to-head record of teams. Each week top half of teams get an extra win, bottom half an extra loss.
Is this the top 6/bot.6 thing we discussed?
This post was edited on 7/22/11 at 7:33 am
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:28 am to Honkus
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:40 am to Honkus
you still play someone head to head each week, and you can win or lose your matchup...however, you get an extra win or loss each week for scoring in the top half of the league. it's the closest thing to what we want.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:44 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
personally i like the head 2 head + an extra win for the top half and an extra loss for the bottom half. it's just like we talked about, except you have an opponent each week in addition to playing against the entire league. that's kind of the best of both worlds.
this is exactly what i proposed when we were discussing the new scoring system
you get H2H AND the new scoring. best of both worlds
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:47 am to PortCityTiger24
Email sent/poll posted.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
eah i like it
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:49 am to PortCityTiger24
plus with this new experimental system, we can all sound snooty and elitist when discussing TDFL
i'm mad at whomever isn't voting for at least 1 keeper
i'm mad at whomever isn't voting for at least 1 keeper
Posted on 7/22/11 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
just got my vote on
Posted on 7/22/11 at 8:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Head-to-Head extra Win/Loss
quote:
i'm mad at whomever isn't voting for at least 1 keeper
whoever voted for 2 keepers, switch your vote to 1... we can do this!!!
Posted on 7/22/11 at 8:12 am to Honkus
These keeper proponents probably should have voted before Draft positions. I don't think guys with low draft picks will be thrilled about keepers.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 8:20 am to barry
quote:
These keeper proponents probably should have voted before Draft positions. I don't think guys with low draft picks will be thrilled about keepers.
Can you PLEASE find something else to cry about??
people that are for keeper are going to vote for keepers...people that against keepers will vote against them.
QB's would probably be keepers for a lot of people, and they aren't going to be at the top of the draft.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 8:42 am to PortCityTiger24
Also, a cool feature on RT is that you can see everyone who has/has not voted. You can't see what they voted for, but you can see if they voted.
Honk, if more people vote to have keepers, we will revote on the amount. No need to switch up votes.
Honk, if more people vote to have keepers, we will revote on the amount. No need to switch up votes.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 9:05 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
if more people vote to have keepers, we will revote on the amount
fair enough. probably shoulda been a yes/no vote on keepers 1st, then another to determine how many if necc.
(i'm not crying tho)
This post was edited on 7/22/11 at 9:06 am
Posted on 7/22/11 at 9:07 am to rmc
Yeah that's correct.
Also, it should be known that the options are not by conference. Play all is against the entire league.
We would still take the top 6 teams at the end of the year per each conference and put them in their own playoffs, but all of these options are against the league.
League average is against all 24
Head to Head + an extra win would be the top 24teams, not 12 in your conference. Top half of the league gets an extra win.
ect
Also, it should be known that the options are not by conference. Play all is against the entire league.
We would still take the top 6 teams at the end of the year per each conference and put them in their own playoffs, but all of these options are against the league.
League average is against all 24
Head to Head + an extra win would be the top 24teams, not 12 in your conference. Top half of the league gets an extra win.
ect
Posted on 7/22/11 at 9:07 am to Toula
+1 win option for the win
Posted on 7/22/11 at 9:08 am to Honkus
quote:
fair enough. probably shoulda been a yes/no vote on keepers 1st, then another to determine how many if necc.
Probably, but the results will be the same. If more people vote for keepers than not keepers, we'll revote on how many it should be. problem solved.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 9:22 am to Honkus
quote:
whoever voted for 2 keepers, switch your vote to 1... we can do this!!!
i voted 2, before i voted for 1
Page 24 of 63
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News