Started By
Message

re: TDBL Official Updated Keeper List

Posted on 3/9/10 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74424 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

ive said nothing of the such until you told me that kendrick and quentin is a better deal then bartlett and lind and told me it was based on the fact that kendrick might be able to produce like bartlett


you win. your deal is better.

quote:

yeesh, guy drops a HAHAHAHAHAHA and now he has a bad attitude and says crazy shite all the time, which looking back over that email, isnt close to the case


laughing in CAPS (CAPS!!) at another owner who's trying to explain his reasoning to you for doing a trade? great negotiating ploy. i've been wondering how you do it
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 7:59 pm to
you like a duo better that come in lower at their respective positions in both cases?


and lind is a year younger than quentin, OMG one year to keep putting up better numbers, OMG
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:01 pm to
If you are trying to sell Lind, hit me up Cat.
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

laughing in CAPS (CAPS!!) at another owner who's trying to explain his reasoning to you for doing a trade? great negotiating ploy. i've been wondering how you do it



you told me that his deal was better then mine, when both of us who have similar ranking systems have shown that its not


sorry, ill change what i said



haha
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:01 pm to
im not selling lind the way you want me to sell him
Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

sorry, ill change what i said



haha
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74424 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

you like a duo better that come in lower at their respective positions in both cases?


you believe everything you type? two guys coming off career years, of course they're higher on the "player projector" OMG OMG

quote:

and lind is a year younger than quentin, OMG one year to keep putting up better numbers, OMG


signs of a man defeated in an internet argument
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290732 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:02 pm to
Lind kind of came from out of nowhere though

Bartlett has been around awhile and coming off a career year after doing relatively nothing




Quentin has always displayed major power potential dating back to college.

Kendrick is still young and is a former minor league hitting champ with some production in the majors.



just the way i view each player
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74424 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:04 pm to
ron, $100 quentin/kendrick out produce lind/bartlett this year
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

you like a duo better that come in lower at their respective positions in both cases?


I like the fact that Kendrick is a natural hitter and that he may win a batting title one year. As he gets older, he will develop some more pop. Bartlett is on his way out.

Lind and Quentin are basically a wash, IMO. They've each had one solid season, and Quentin's was better in 100 less ABs.

Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:05 pm to
My offer for eithier and Young still stands for Reynolds
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

signs of a man defeated in an internet argument



not really gyno, not sure where that came from


Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

Lind kind of came from out of nowhere though



any coincidence that it was his first full year as a starter?

hard to put up numbers when you are a part time player
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74424 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

My offer for eithier and Young still stands for Reynolds


frickS YEA!!!!!
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74424 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:09 pm to
i think Lind will be fine this year. Again, like Redd said, I like Kendrick's potential more than Bartlett, who is still above average at the weakest position in fantasy!
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:11 pm to
and like we have already talked about

bartlett will score more runs, and steal like double the bags. i understand you totally devalue steals, but its stupid to do so


thats like saying, hey, lind is as good as braun, except he hits like ten homers less
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

frickS YEA!!!!!



so you're saying theres a chance?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290732 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:12 pm to
sometimes u are a part time player for a reason

he was never projected to be a 35 HR guy, so who knows.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Quentin-31
Kendrick-156

Lind-21
Bartlett-89



Ethier - 27
Young - 87

on da Redd rankings list


Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/9/10 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

thats like saying, hey, lind is as good as braun, except he hits like ten homers less


no it's not
first pageprev pagePage 102 of 168Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram