- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/2/13 at 9:10 am to Evolve
Well he has
Flacco for Manning
Rodgers for Gore
Dickson for Davis
LaFell/Moore for Welker
still would be a loss but go for the points since that determines tie breakers
Flacco for Manning
Rodgers for Gore
Dickson for Davis
LaFell/Moore for Welker
still would be a loss but go for the points since that determines tie breakers
Posted on 11/3/13 at 6:45 am to tduecen
Not good for Tuck
quote:
Via Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette, the Packers want to reel in rookie Eddie Lacy’s touches. Against the Vikings in Week Eight, Lacy had a whopping 29 carries and four receptions.
“We had an extra day [to recover] this week with the Monday night game, that plays into it too,” said Packers running backs coach Alex Van Pelt. “But we’re definitely monitoring the carries for him, try to get him back down to around 20.”
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:13 am to tduecen
That's why, after I got Doug Martin on waivers, I immediately dropped and picked up Starks. 
Tue, Oct 29 at 11:57am
Head coach Mike McCarthy indicated he would like to give Starks more carries moving forward, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.
Analysis: It's highly unlikely that Starks will challenge for Eddie Lacy's starting job, but it seems that McCarthy does want to even out the workload to some degree after Lacy carried 29 times to Starks' seven in Sunday's victory over the Vikings. Starks ran well in his first game since Week 3, so expect the ratio of carries in most cases to be closer to 2:1 rather than the roughly 4:1 distribution used in Sunday's game. With the Packers running the ball often and effectively, and getting leads, consider a healthy Starks among the top group of running backs who do not currently start for their NFL team
Tue, Oct 29 at 11:57am
Head coach Mike McCarthy indicated he would like to give Starks more carries moving forward, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.
Analysis: It's highly unlikely that Starks will challenge for Eddie Lacy's starting job, but it seems that McCarthy does want to even out the workload to some degree after Lacy carried 29 times to Starks' seven in Sunday's victory over the Vikings. Starks ran well in his first game since Week 3, so expect the ratio of carries in most cases to be closer to 2:1 rather than the roughly 4:1 distribution used in Sunday's game. With the Packers running the ball often and effectively, and getting leads, consider a healthy Starks among the top group of running backs who do not currently start for their NFL team
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 9:14 am
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:17 am to Alahunter
Doug Martin is done for anyway, I own him in a different league and dropped him for Mike Tolbert
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:24 am to tduecen
yeah. I thought he might be back soon, but looking at his stats, and then seeing what Starks might be doing, they're comparable. And if Lacy were to get hurt, Starks would be the #1 now. Same reason I picked up Brown in Indy. He's still outproducing Trent, so he could end up getting more carries as the season goes too. Hoping I end up with 1 good replacement out of the 2 if AP or Bush goes down at some point.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:27 am to tduecen
Any news on JJ yet? I need Boykin to do well today.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:19 am to Alahunter
quote:Well you have to wait till Monday
I need Boykin to do well today.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:24 am to tduecen
Yeah..
I just made the other thread cuz I am nervous about JJ getting too much time when he comes back. Didn't think about who would be matched up on Tate.
I just made the other thread cuz I am nervous about JJ getting too much time when he comes back. Didn't think about who would be matched up on Tate.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:27 am to Alahunter
Especially with Revis saying he will be playing more man coverage now that he is feeling better
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:18 pm to Evolve
NGT:
quote:
Darren Sproles left Sunday's Week 9 game against the Jets in the first quarter with an undisclosed injury. On the opening drive of the game, Sproles caught a two-yard swing pass and got tangled up with a bunch of defenders. Trainers quickly looked at this left ankle and then he went to the locker room. Consider Sproles questionable to return
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:31 pm to tduecen
Great
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:34 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Coulda had MJD
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:35 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
@ClaytonESPN: Darren Sproles out of the game for the Saints with an ankle injury.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:39 pm to tduecen
Still came out ahead. Hunter wasn't interested in Roddy.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:40 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
I was interested in AJ
Posted on 11/3/13 at 1:10 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
See why I wasn't trading Jimmy Graham.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 1:11 pm to Duke
Posted on 11/3/13 at 4:04 pm to tduecen
Mike James having a nice game, better than Martin
Posted on 11/3/13 at 4:22 pm to tduecen
Man, forget a Gronkowski. 
Page 65 of 103
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News