Started By
Message

re: Revamped TDBL is Here

Posted on 2/5/19 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by swamie
Where opportunity meets hard work
Member since Jan 2007
27253 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 12:35 pm to
Think there's a spot to join if you clink the link a couple pages back.

Slow draft has passed.


This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 1:13 pm
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 12:35 pm to
Bingo.

Either way, we'll know the format of the league and people can/join or leave accordingly.

Link to join:
LINK
This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 12:38 pm
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 12:43 pm to
I voted
Posted by fratmonster
Member since Oct 2005
10942 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:10 pm to
Dang, looks like I missed out. Says all 16 teams are full
Posted by swamie
Where opportunity meets hard work
Member since Jan 2007
27253 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:12 pm to
What do you do in case of tie-breaker? Commish decision?

8-7 in favor of Roto at the moment.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:16 pm to
Group fight at Sonics. Last man standing.
Posted by TTownTiger
Austin
Member since Oct 2007
5301 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Dang, looks like I missed out. Says all 16 teams are full



Might be a couple of openings once roto or H2H is decided if a couple owners don't like the final decision.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:21 pm to
Who's the last vote any how?

Virtual coin flip.
LINK /
Posted by swamie
Where opportunity meets hard work
Member since Jan 2007
27253 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:23 pm to



Not sure anymore who needs to vote. I imagine I need commish access to see that. I was just going by who logged in today.
This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 1:24 pm
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
50929 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:23 pm to
ill change my vote to roto... website wont let me change but let the record show i want rotisserie
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78186 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:27 pm to
I'd be willing to bet you could fill two leagues with the exact formats, except one be roto and one be h2h.

Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17710 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:28 pm to
yep
Posted by fratmonster
Member since Oct 2005
10942 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:50 pm to
I'm in if we do a H2H alternative league. I'll pass on roto
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:53 pm to
Well that pretty much secures it.

16 teams ROTO 5x5(may be 14 depends on who comes and goes)

Hitting - OPS, HR, R, RBI, SB
Pitching - QS, ERA, WHIP, SV, K

Categories up for discussion:
SV vs. SVH
K vs. K/9

My preference here is K's with a max inning limit like VKC's but people for K/9 can certainly vote on that. There will definitely be a minimum innings limit if it's K/9.


This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 1:55 pm
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
50929 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:58 pm to
Ks (w/ 1200IP)
Net steals (SB-CS)
net saves (SV-BS)
no holds
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71927 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 1:58 pm to
H2h is shitty especially for baseball if you’re interested in declaring a true best team. I think it became a thing here as an effort to motivate bad owners to stay active, which has proven to be false. Crappy owners are crappy regardless

Papzy, SVH and total Ks w IP limit imo
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 2:10 pm to
K's are the way to go. I currently have 1200 as minimum and 1400 IP as max. This can be changed.

We'll poll SV/SVH/NSV.

Posted by swamie
Where opportunity meets hard work
Member since Jan 2007
27253 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

H2h is shitty especially for baseball if you’re interested in declaring a true best team.


Yeah it sucks getting a 6-4 against a team who checks out after your match up and gives another team in the running an easy 9-1 later in the year because they never bothered to replace a bust or injured players.


quote:

SVH and total Ks w IP limit imo



I'm on board with this.

Not enough good closers to go straight SV, K over K/9 limits going too far with trying to account for every set up man or LOOGY, max IP to balance everything out.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Not enough good closers to go straight SV


I agree.

I don't like NSVs personally as a middle reliever can blow a save and not get credited for anything if HLDs aren't counted.


Also, payout discussion. Right now I'm thinking this.

1st 50% - 1200
2nd 25% - 600
3rd 15% - 360
4th 10% - 240

We can also do a bottom feeder penalty here. Doesn't have to be anything crazy.

If anyone wants to take the bull by the horns here and take the lead on everything, please let me know. I prefer just to pay and play.
This post was edited on 2/5/19 at 2:28 pm
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
50929 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 2:28 pm to
ok yall convinced me for saves + holds. seems like adding holds waters down the category but with 16 teams perhaps its nbd


i also paid. we should talk ab payouts... I'd like to pay out top 4 or 5, if possible


1st- $1,200
2nd- $500
3rd- $400
4th- $200
5th- $100

something like that
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram