- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Opinions on a Trade Made in the League Today
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:38 pm
PPR League/12 Man
Owner traded Antonio Brown for Alshon and McCaffrey.
Veto is in question but there is conflict in the talks of it.
The team that got AB now has wentz, Gurley, Freeman, AB, M. Thomas,Ertz
Opinions? Should it be vetoed or should it not?
Owner traded Antonio Brown for Alshon and McCaffrey.
Veto is in question but there is conflict in the talks of it.
The team that got AB now has wentz, Gurley, Freeman, AB, M. Thomas,Ertz
Opinions? Should it be vetoed or should it not?
6
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:40 pm to 225Tigah
Not veto worthy.
As long as neither is eliminated from playoff contention
As long as neither is eliminated from playoff contention
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:41 pm to 225Tigah
Is it a keeper league? Are both teams fighting for playoff spot?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:43 pm to 225Tigah
Def not veto worthy but why the hell has the trade deadline not passed in your league?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:45 pm to ineededanewname
Both teams have a spot as of this week, but half of the teams that already secured a spot in the playoff disagree with the trade.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:46 pm to bayouboy33
No trade deadline, but I proposed this idea which was shot down.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:50 pm to 225Tigah
Why exactly do you think this is veto worthy?in ppr Those two are rb1 and wr1 ROS
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:51 pm to 225Tigah
I think the trade deadline should be later just because of injuries... however if both teams are fighting then that trade is fine
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:59 pm to 225Tigah
Why is the trade being questioned? You left that part out...
Collusion? Trade rape accusations?
Collusion? Trade rape accusations?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:09 pm to 225Tigah
I’m not even sure which side you think is unfair. I guess you think the side getting Brown is better off but a legit RB1 and WR2 is a solid haul.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:35 pm to 225Tigah
Seems like a pretty fair trade to me 
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:34 pm to Eighteen
Final Decision: There isn't going to be a veto. The conflict was that it was presumed to be unfair because alshon and McCaffrey have not matched AB's points in the past weeks. And the player receiving McCaffrey already had two running backs better than McCaffrey. His flex spot is better than CM also.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:36 pm to 225Tigah
quote:I mean is he starting Bell, Kamara, and Gurley?
And the player receiving McCaffrey already had two running backs better than McCaffrey. His flex spot is better than CM also.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:24 pm to 225Tigah
Geez, what a bunch of babies! That’s a fair trade!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News