- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:19 pm to GynoSandberg
yah, it doesn't matter too much to me.
I think players that ended the year on the 60-Day should be eligible immediately to be on the DL.
But I ain't sweating about it. Let's just vote.
Like I said before, I didn't draft A.J. Griffin with the hope of stashing him and rushing to the wire to pick up Alfredo Simon.
I think players that ended the year on the 60-Day should be eligible immediately to be on the DL.
But I ain't sweating about it. Let's just vote.
Like I said before, I didn't draft A.J. Griffin with the hope of stashing him and rushing to the wire to pick up Alfredo Simon.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:19 pm to reddman
In other words, if a guy isnt on the 60 day DL. then he has to be removed from the roster.
No poll needed. Go with what the rules say already.
Topic over.
No poll needed. Go with what the rules say already.
Topic over.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:20 pm to reddman
Remove the poll, Barry. It isn't necessary. The constitution already addresses the issue. End of discussion.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:21 pm to reddman
Is anyone left on the 60 day dl in the offseason?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:21 pm to rondo
I said 5 pages ago guys on DL at the end of the season can carry over to the offseason. I don't even care if it's a 15 day DL
As it always has thiigh, it should not be put into place until next season. Or do we want to start amending rules on the fly?
As it always has thiigh, it should not be put into place until next season. Or do we want to start amending rules on the fly?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:23 pm to reddman
The constitution cannot be amended?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:25 pm to rondo
Nope. Rules are rules.
Deal with it.
Deal with it.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:27 pm to reddman
You seem extra fgty today
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:29 pm to rondo
I'm sick of this topic. It's not even a major issue, but some have decided to dig their heels in over trivial shite. Just go with what the rules actually say and be done with it.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:32 pm to reddman
so the answer to some teams placing players on the DL before others is deal with it?
rules are rules.
rules are rules.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:33 pm to swamie
Sorry dude. It's just the way it goes sometimes.
Tough break.
Tough break.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:34 pm to reddman
After reviewing the established rules, I agree with Redd, my proposal is the exact same thing as the rules.
No players are on ML DL list in the offseason, therefore they can't be placed on the DL on your team during the offseason.
They don't have to be removed if they were there at the end of the season though because its only a penalty if you have an illegal lineup, which you can't have unless there is a game.
No players are on ML DL list in the offseason, therefore they can't be placed on the DL on your team during the offseason.
They don't have to be removed if they were there at the end of the season though because its only a penalty if you have an illegal lineup, which you can't have unless there is a game.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:36 pm to reddman
No need to get upset , we're just sorting shite out.
There's a lot of money on the line. I don't think any rule is trivial. It's important to settle on something
There's a lot of money on the line. I don't think any rule is trivial. It's important to settle on something
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:36 pm to reddman
I'm chill.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:38 pm to swamie
I just found this while looking up Victorino's eligibility that some may find interesting.
(10/31/14) The Red Sox have activated outfielder Shane Victorino from the 60-day disabled list.
Players can't remain on the 60-day DL during the offseason in order to shore up 40-man rosters. Victorino had back surgery in August. He can return to the 60-day disabled list near the start of next season if he still needs to recover.
(10/31/14) The Red Sox have activated outfielder Shane Victorino from the 60-day disabled list.
Players can't remain on the 60-day DL during the offseason in order to shore up 40-man rosters. Victorino had back surgery in August. He can return to the 60-day disabled list near the start of next season if he still needs to recover.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:40 pm to barry
If you're going to the rules in place now, no player should be allowed on the DL in the offseason, even if they were there to end the season. Pretty cut and dry there
Having a legal \ illegal roster is irrevelvant to the DL rule
Having a legal \ illegal roster is irrevelvant to the DL rule
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:43 pm to papz
Yep just further proof that offseason DL is imaginary
Still the 60 day DL is something that categorizes a pretty serious injury.
Still the 60 day DL is something that categorizes a pretty serious injury.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:46 pm to EarlyBird
I need clarification here....
At the end of this season if I have a guy on my DL that is also on the MLB 60 day...can I keep him on my DL all offseason?
At the end of this season if I have a guy on my DL that is also on the MLB 60 day...can I keep him on my DL all offseason?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 12:54 pm to rondo
Yeah, for me, Choo ended the season on the 60 day DL but has since been activated.
Page 75 of 93
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News