- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:07 am to barry
Agreed, except for the minor league DL option. But I'm not gonna fight something that has little to no bearing on the league makeup.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:12 am to reddman
I vote for whatever option allows me to DL wieters and beachy
Posted on 2/8/15 at 10:25 am to rondo
Wieters is likely to be active to begin the year.
Might be better to implement rule after opening day this year (21 words).
Might be better to implement rule after opening day this year (21 words).
This post was edited on 2/8/15 at 10:29 am
Posted on 2/8/15 at 10:33 am to EarlyBird
Are we going to set a date to run waivers?
Posted on 2/8/15 at 10:45 am to EarlyBird
Ok...then beachy
Just let me have beachy
Just let me have beachy
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:14 am to EarlyBird
Players have already been put on waivers. I'm assuming it will run tonight.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:22 am to reddman
I didn't draft A.J. Griffin with the hope of being able to stash him on the DL; I wanted him on my team.
It's no big deal to me to be able put him on the DL, and rush to the waiver wire to pick up Alfredo Simon.
That is why we have this deep of a league.
But my vote would be players that ended the year on DL, should be eligible to be on the DL through the offseason
It's no big deal to me to be able put him on the DL, and rush to the waiver wire to pick up Alfredo Simon.
That is why we have this deep of a league.
But my vote would be players that ended the year on DL, should be eligible to be on the DL through the offseason
This post was edited on 2/8/15 at 11:37 am
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:26 am to reddman
what if we only allow 1 DL spot in the offseason? and the guy has to be there to end the season. None of this red flag bullshite
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:36 am to Lester Earl
If you have 2 or more TJs you'd still be dumping players to accommodate them. In one of my leagues they have an expanded 43 man roster during the offseason to allow for the 3 DL spots to be held, but after the start of the season those spots need to be occupied by guys designated on the DL and they go back to 40 man rosters.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:36 am to EarlyBird
Your team will be fun to watch. I know you are raw being able to own all of those stud prospects 
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:40 am to GynoSandberg
I have a bunch of cross-league players also so I could be fricked from multiple angles. But yeah, I enjoy getting in on the ground floor.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:48 am to EarlyBird
whats the big deal about having to dump players?
i guess the better question is why should you be able to keep them? There is no DL in the offseason
i guess the better question is why should you be able to keep them? There is no DL in the offseason
Posted on 2/8/15 at 12:08 pm to Lester Earl
We have DL spots for a reason. And this is a dynasty with a long-term perspective. If a productive player stubs his toe and needs surgery. Then he's on the DL or you need to eat a roster spot (which eliminates the premise of the DL spot). If we're going to have DL spots designed to allow keeping hurt players, that should apply during the offseason, if necessary. My point is we can regulate the possibility of it being abused while keeping the original intent in place.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 12:16 pm to EarlyBird
So, who has an extra SS to trade me? 
Posted on 2/8/15 at 12:35 pm to rondo
naw i purposely avoided that sack of shite the whole draft
Posted on 2/8/15 at 12:37 pm to EarlyBird
quote:
We have DL spots for a reason.
well yea, for in season.
Not to guess who should or shouldnt be eligible for that spot when no games are being played
quote:
My point is we can regulate the possibility of it being abused while keeping the original intent in place
how?
Popular
Back to top



0





