- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:46 pm to OBUDan
Deal
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:49 pm to MrWiseGuy
Proposal sent your way
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:50 pm to MrWiseGuy
Done and done
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
what'd you get rid of brown for?
eta: nm got rid of andre, I was thinking antonio
eta: nm got rid of andre, I was thinking antonio
This post was edited on 9/19/12 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:01 pm to BilJ
That shite gonna get pushed through for tomorrow?
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:03 pm to OBUDan
Giving up on Decker eh?
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:09 pm to TulaneTigerFan
Sorta. Mostly overloaded at WR.
And I'm keen on Andre, so I was comfortable with it.
And I'm keen on Andre, so I was comfortable with it.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:12 pm to OBUDan
After all the hurtful things you said about me last week after the trade I just don't know...I just don't know
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:14 pm to BilJ
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:21 pm to OBUDan
Does yahoo allow us to do a vote for trade approvals? In another league you can just approve a trade and it automatically goes thru after 6 approves. Helps trades go thru much faster. I would think we could do a quick league vote and change this, if it lets you. Thoughts?
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:25 pm to ehidal1
I think I have it set up for 24 hrs to protest
but again, nothing shady about this deal so I'll give the opportunity for it to be viewed and then push it through tomorrow, barring someone raising total hell....
but again, nothing shady about this deal so I'll give the opportunity for it to be viewed and then push it through tomorrow, barring someone raising total hell....
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:30 pm to BilJ
Yeah, I agree. I wasn't complaining. With Thursday night football every week, it makes trading a bitch. Gotta wait til after waivers, then bam its gameday.
and has driveman been MIA? I sent him a trade offer but no response.
and has driveman been MIA? I sent him a trade offer but no response.
This post was edited on 9/19/12 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:48 pm to ehidal1
I really think 90% of trades don't require a vote, but that's just me....
Driveman and Bourg have been largely absent
Driveman and Bourg have been largely absent
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:04 pm to BilJ
quote:
but again, nothing shady about this deal so I'll give the opportunity for it to be viewed and then push it through tomorrow, barring someone raising total hell....
Nobody should have any say so in any deal they are not involved. Period. Unless there is blatant evidence that collusion is going on.
The veto process is the stupidest aspect of fantasy football.
Not saying y'all think we colluded. I just am in favor of the commish pushing every trade through immediately once he sees it.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:10 pm to MrWiseGuy
I agree wise and j. All the 'should I veto this trade' threads piss me off. I love some of these FF legends in their own mind telling people how to run their teams because they don't deem them as 'fair'. That's bullshite. Collision only veto. Everything else is a slippery slope.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:23 pm to MrWiseGuy
I've only stepped in and vetoed a trade once. Last year they tried this deal.... Colt McCoy, Peyton Hillis, Malcolm Floyd for Brees and MJD.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:30 pm to BilJ
I have been in 2-3 leagues for the past 8 years and can't recall a trade worthy of a veto.
Last year guys in one league bitched cause a guy offered me Gore and Sims walker for grant and Floyd. I dot even know the guy and he offered it to me so no collusion. I said who are you guys to judge what this guy wants and doesn't want. He hated Gore (injury) and had hopes for Grant. Let him play he paid his money too.
Last year guys in one league bitched cause a guy offered me Gore and Sims walker for grant and Floyd. I dot even know the guy and he offered it to me so no collusion. I said who are you guys to judge what this guy wants and doesn't want. He hated Gore (injury) and had hopes for Grant. Let him play he paid his money too.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:37 pm to ehidal1
I'm not a fan of trade vetoes either. In my big league, the veto process is used almost exclusively to screw other owners (to keep a guy's team from becoming 'too good'). I've been screwed mutliple times out of legit deals that both parties were excited about, but got vetoed. Player values are so subjective. Now we're stuck with a league votes system because everyone is wary of the commish being invloved in trades. I don't like it, but it at least puts a check on the commish's powers. IMO trades should be pretty much be a rubber stamp unless there is something obviously wrong.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 5:52 pm to Nature Boy
Vetoes are dumb.
Page 53 of 86
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News