- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brand New TD Dynasty League - Season 2
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:10 pm to VermilionTiger
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:10 pm to VermilionTiger
There is a survey monkey link on the leagues home page
0
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:14 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Cool daddio
Where moving
quote:
Houston
My man! We gonna be neighbors!
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:28 pm to TthomasJR
Got it.
Sorry for the delay. Schedule shouldn't be like this after today
Sorry for the delay. Schedule shouldn't be like this after today
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:38 pm to VermilionTiger
I think you are good. I think most of us just wanted the league rules and settings ironed out, and draft order set.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:41 pm to TthomasJR
I guess the next big thing is just figuring out the money.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:44 pm to Peazey
Flatter payout structure could be another incentive to not tank.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 1:55 pm to DallasTiger45
What do you mean exactly?
Give me an example of what you're thinking plz
Give me an example of what you're thinking plz
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:08 pm to GynoSandberg
Examples would be
1) weekly winner payouts- high score for the week gets paid a set amount
2) paying more places at end of season/paying more to non champion finishes
My thinking is we want to make the cost/benefit analysis tougher when it comes to the decision to sell assets and tank vs attempt to compete through the end of the regular season.
1) weekly winner payouts- high score for the week gets paid a set amount
2) paying more places at end of season/paying more to non champion finishes
My thinking is we want to make the cost/benefit analysis tougher when it comes to the decision to sell assets and tank vs attempt to compete through the end of the regular season.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:22 pm to DallasTiger45
Ah I see. We did the weekly thing in another league on here to try and keep interest. Only $10 though, I don't think it was that effective. A higher payout per week may be though
We gotta stretch $1400 @ $100 per owner. If everyone were to throw up $125, we could allocate $25 per week for 13 weeks for high weekly scorer and not touch the $1400
Personally I like to see reg season winner not be shorted. Much harder to lead for 13 weeks than it is to win a 3 week tourney in the playoffs
I would say pay out reg season champion, overall champion, overall runner up, then see what we can allocate to week to week high scorers
We gotta stretch $1400 @ $100 per owner. If everyone were to throw up $125, we could allocate $25 per week for 13 weeks for high weekly scorer and not touch the $1400
Personally I like to see reg season winner not be shorted. Much harder to lead for 13 weeks than it is to win a 3 week tourney in the playoffs
I would say pay out reg season champion, overall champion, overall runner up, then see what we can allocate to week to week high scorers
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:28 pm to GynoSandberg
I think we are all working too hard to find the ideal situation. How about people not be shitty owners?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:32 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
I would say pay out reg season champion,
record wise or total points?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:39 pm to MrWiseGuy
Record wise, most points break a tie if two have same record at the top
Most wins in a top bottom is most telling. Consistently best team
You could score 300 one week and 80 the next kinda thing, skews most points
Most wins in a top bottom is most telling. Consistently best team
You could score 300 one week and 80 the next kinda thing, skews most points
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:43 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
We gotta stretch $1400 @ $100 per owner. If everyone were to throw up $125, we could allocate $25 per week for 13 weeks for high weekly scorer and not touc
I like this.
I seriously wanna kick dudes out the league for intentionally tanking.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:47 pm to Gtothemoney
quote:
I seriously wanna kick dudes out the league for intentionally tanking.
I think ultimately this is the actual method that is most likely to be effective. You keep kicking people out who show poor sportsmanship until you are left with a group that has proven over time to not be shitheads. It's a long term strategy for sure.
Replacing people in a dynasty league does present some special challenges though.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:49 pm to GynoSandberg
You want to draft a league constitution?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:53 pm to Peazey
quote:
Replacing people in a dynasty league does present some special challenges though.
Maybe not. We can incentivize a new potential owner with an additional draft pick, and/or not making him pay a bottom feeder penalty for that year.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:53 pm to MrWiseGuy
At some point. Trying to track everything in the OP
Are you volunteering
Are you volunteering
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:57 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Are you volunteering
you da man
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:05 pm to Gtothemoney
I don't see it being a huge issue in football. It's too easy to make a bad team good year year
As long as people are setting lineups w their best players we will be fine
If you're leaving bye week guys in you'll just get the boot
As long as people are setting lineups w their best players we will be fine
If you're leaving bye week guys in you'll just get the boot
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:07 pm to Gtothemoney
Yeah, you would have to incentivize it somehow. It probably would have to be negotiated at the moment with the indiviual. Anyway, we don't have to worry about that for at least a year and hopefully longer than that.
Page 10 of 141
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News