- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2011 TDBL Keeper Thread
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:48 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:48 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
it all equals out in the end my friend
from a 16th spot perspective, id rather the back to back sandwich picks than a pick every 15 picks.
Of course you would. It helps the strong stay strong. I just think a standard style is more fair in a long term keeper league, where there is NO limit on how long you can keep a player.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:49 pm to Lester Earl
I wish i knew what I was doing.
*In baseball
*In baseball
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:51 pm to reddman
I'm going to have to side with Lester here. No one's team became good through any of the drafts after the 1st anyway.
And tax cuts for the wealthy, too!!!
And tax cuts for the wealthy, too!!!
This post was edited on 1/3/11 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:52 pm to reddman
quote:
Of course you would. It helps the strong stay strong.
well it would all even out through the draft, like you said. At one point you will have 31 picks between your own.
but the top rounds are important, i think being able to add 2 quality players back to back at 16/17 is more beneficial to your team than doing it the other way
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:53 pm to cwill
quote:
I'm going to have to side with Lester here. No one's team became good through any of the drafts after the 1st anyway.
Of course they didn't. I was speaking tongue-in-cheek with the one pick in 30 picks comment.
However, I still think that standard is better in a format like this. I'm doing some research now to strengthen my argument.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:54 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
but the top rounds are important, i think being able to add 2 quality players back to back at 16/17 is more beneficial to your team than doing it the other way
But it's NOT beneficial to the guy with the first pick. Start thinking about the entire league, and not just yourself.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:55 pm to reddman
in a pay league, i could give two shits about anyone else
that being said, reduce the number of keepers if you want to make an attempt to increase parity
that being said, reduce the number of keepers if you want to make an attempt to increase parity
This post was edited on 1/3/11 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:56 pm to reddman
quote:
Start thinking about the entire league, and not just yourself.
Greed is good.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:57 pm to Rouge
quote:
that being less, reduce the number of keepers if you want to make an attempt to increase parity
If there were less keepers, I wouldn't be in favor of a standard draft.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:58 pm to reddman
quote:
But it's NOT beneficial to the guy with the first pick.
to play devils advocate, I doubt the guy with the first pick would ever trade his first two picks for the 16th guys first two picks
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:59 pm to Lester Earl
Who are the shitty teams???
Posted on 1/3/11 at 12:59 pm to reddman
I would vote for less keepers IMO
10 to be specific
10 to be specific
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:00 pm to rondo
quote:
I would vote for less keepers IMO
As would I, but that has been shot down several times.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:00 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Who are the shitty teams???
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:01 pm to reddman
I argued against the increase from 10 to 12 in year 1 based on parity. Now that I have taken my team from last to first under those rules I don't think we need to go back to 10 keepers.
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:01 pm to reddman
quote:
As would I, but that has been shot down several times.
I think even Will, the best team in the league, has requested less keepers. 10 would be better, but I am now content with 12.
ETA: N/M
This post was edited on 1/3/11 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:02 pm to reddman
quote:
But it's NOT beneficial to the guy with the first pick. Start thinking about the entire league, and not just yourself.
how is that thinking about myself?
i have no clue where i am going to draf
it is beneficial to the guy with the 1st pick. HE GETS THE 1st PICK!
This post was edited on 1/3/11 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:02 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Who are the shitty teams???
honk
slick rick
barry
boo
earl (please don't kill me)
Posted on 1/3/11 at 1:03 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
how is that thinking about myself?
it is beneficial to the guy with the 1st pick. HE GETS THE 1st PICK!
It was a joke, dude.
I forgot to put the
Popular
Back to top



3






