Started By
Message

#1 Waiver priority advice

Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:06 pm
Posted by Joe Davola
Phoenix
Member since Jan 2014
477 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:06 pm
I’m in a 14 team PPR league and my RBs are Cook, Sanders, Gordon, Montgomery, and L. Perine (droppable). I have the #1 waiver priority. Do I use it? Davis, McKinnon, and Henderson are all available. Or do I hold onto it for down the road. I’m currently leaning towards saving it but am curious on the board’s thoughts.

Thanks for any input.
Posted by PelsForLife
Member since May 2019
456 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 1:26 pm to
Use on Mike Davis imo.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17445 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 1:37 pm to
Henderson. Mike Davis will just be a shitty RB on a team that is always trailing.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7901 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 2:30 pm to
RBs on the wire: Rank ROS

Kelley
Peterson
Snell
Thompson
McKinnon
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38370 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 3:05 pm to


Kelly- 1B workload


Peterson- Heavy carry workload, game scripts will kill him

Snell- Standalone value depends on starter availability

Mckinnon- Standalone value depends on starter availability + viable #3 RB on roster

Thompson- Carries aren't there

That's how I see it forecast over 16 weeks as of today.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7901 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Riseupfromtherubble


Solid. Really I think it’s smart for a decimated RB roster to just find the most stable situation possible. WRs for the upside.

RB was thin to start the year it just got horrendous for the position.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38370 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Really I think it’s smart for a decimated RB roster to just find the most stable situation possible. WRs for the upside.



As do I. You need steady points, even if it's 8 per week. A guy like Jamaal Williams gets slept on in these conversations. He's averaging 7.25 though 2 games without a touchdown and is usually good for 1-3 games per season over 20 points. He's more plug and play than Thompson or Mckinnon for me long term if you are the Saquon owner. The packers are going to use him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram