- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What should scare Dems more than anything
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:25 am
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:25 am
From a trend perspective, Georgia is their only bright spot. Texas is not purple. Florida, Ohio and Iowa are off the table. Arizona is red. The blue wall will be moving red going forward. Nevada is moving red. Virginia, NH, and even NJ are now the GOP reach states.
And just wait until the 2030 census when Texas and Florida add electoral votes and blue states lose them
And just wait until the 2030 census when Texas and Florida add electoral votes and blue states lose them
8
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:25 am to armtackledawg
The truth.
Release J6 peeps today.
Release J6 peeps today.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to t00f
Yes and the Epstein list
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to armtackledawg
If we fix immigration and make it easy for middle class families to raise families bigger than 1 child conservatives could have a bright future.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to armtackledawg
There is no reason Pennsylvania should not join Ohio as a new permanent red state.
Registrations are trending that way too.
Registrations are trending that way too.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to armtackledawg
This is going to turn into a meme of overconfidence, but it's one race that was largely a rejection of the DEMs. Don't try to extrapolate this into some long-term mandate.
The past 3 Presidential elections have been referendums on the person in power and they all lost. Now the GOP has to avoid doing that in 2028 with an economic time bomb ticking and inflation unable to be contained.
The past 3 Presidential elections have been referendums on the person in power and they all lost. Now the GOP has to avoid doing that in 2028 with an economic time bomb ticking and inflation unable to be contained.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to armtackledawg
The GOP has to figure out a way to fix Georgia, lock up Pennsylvania when they inevitably run Shapiro, and make Wisconsin/Michigan a wider margin.
They have four years to figure it out, but looking at Florida, it can be done.
They have four years to figure it out, but looking at Florida, it can be done.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:27 am to armtackledawg
I would even say Illinois may be a GOP reach state and New Jersey especially if they can get another Republican Governor in office after Murphy.
Virginia and New Jersey should be the next targets over the next 1-2 cycles.
Virginia and New Jersey should be the next targets over the next 1-2 cycles.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 6:29 am
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:27 am to armtackledawg
quote:
Georgia is their only bright spot.
Georgia needs their own DeSantis to clean up the state elections and I guarantee you Georgia is no longer a swing state.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:28 am to armtackledawg
The last I saw NY was a 10 point difference. I know that's alot of votes, but if there is a mass exodus out of NYC for anything, NY state could be within reach.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is going to turn into a meme of overconfidence, but it's one race that was largely a rejection of the DEMs
I think it is much more a rejection of the political class as a whole, as was 2016.
It may sound overzealous, but I think the US is a sitting on a unique opportunity to usher out a lot of the establishment of DC and remake it through a bloodless revolution.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:31 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
a lot of the establishment of DC
who, specifically?
Because if we're talking about actual politicians, it's still almost exclusively establishment, with a small handful of DSAs and MAGA on the poles.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
who, specifically?
Because if we're talking about actual politicians, it's still almost exclusively establishment, with a small handful of DSAs and MAGA on the poles.
I was thinking more along of the lines of lifelong DC bureaucrats. There needs to be a massive cleaning of the federal agencies.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News