re: The Justice Department won’t have January 6 evidence ready until 2022.

Posted by SlickRick55

Member since May 2016

1883 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:16 am to tiggerthetooth

I’m just so confused as to what “investigating” needs to be done? Other than who orchestrated the whole thing, ok, but what other evidence are you looking for?

Posted by antibarner

Member since Oct 2009

23711 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:23 am to VoxDawg

If Trump should be re elected and someone with sense becomes AG, there MUST BE a purge of DOJ and a Special Prosecutor named to go after all the civil rights violations the Lawfare crowd have committed.

In all honesty you could probably convict a ton of the present DOJ.

Posted by jamboybarry

Member since Feb 2011

32643 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:29 am to Jack Carter

quote:
Kathyrn Fifield, the lead attorney representing the Justice Department, informed Judge Trevor McFadden that the “incalculable” volume of video collected by the government related to the Capitol breach investigation will prevent defendants and their lawyers from accessing the full body of evidence against them for several more months.

Riiiiight

Our Government is such garbage

Posted by Mick Hogger

Little Rock

Member since Nov 2020

399 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:34 am to Jack Carter

By this time next year they may be regretting this show of power with the hatred bubbling in the populace.

Posted by caleb07

Member since Dec 2018

760 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:35 am to Mick Hogger

That was the plan all along.

Posted by LookSquirrel

Member since Oct 2019

5901 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:54 am to VoxDawg

Then please share this for further review,

Did the Capitol Police incite the violence at the Capitol Building on Jan 6th?

It appears so according to this video.
JR Majewski

This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 11:57 am

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo

East Texas Lake

Member since Sep 2018

15036 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:00 pm to Jack Carter

By November of 2022?

Posted by swolverine

Member since Jun 2020

1966 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:02 pm to Jack Carter

(no message)

This post was edited on 12/21/23 at 11:01 am

Posted by Hobnailboot

Minneapolis

Member since Sep 2012

6094 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 1:26 pm to Jack Carter

Evidence of what?? Some neck rubbing his nuts on Pelosi’s desk? Gimme a fricking break. These lunatics in congress have forgotten who they work for and they need to be reminded.

Posted by Swamp Angel

Georgia

Member since Jul 2004

7259 posts

Posted on 7/31/21 at 1:26 pm to Jack Carter

According to Title I of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (revised/amended 1979), trial should generally begin within 100 days of arrest. (See below) And yes, this is FEDERAL LAW.

quote:
Title I of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 88 Stat. 2080, as amended August 2, 1979, 93 Stat. 328, is set forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174. The Act establishes time limits for completing the various stages of a federal criminal prosecution. The information or indictment must be filed within 30 days from the date of arrest or service of the summons. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b). Trial must commence within 70 days from the date the information or indictment was filed, or from the date the defendant appears before an officer of the court in which the charge is pending, whichever is later. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1).

If the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial is determined to have been infringed, charges must be dropped or, in the event of a guilty verdict, that verdict must be overturned.

See link: Criminal Resource Manual: 628 Speedy Trial Act 1974