Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Convert my traditional IRA to a Roth?

Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:08 am
Posted by Fat Man
Gotta Luv Cov ... ington
Member since Jan 2006
7057 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:08 am
Broker wants me to switch over. Says advantages are I won't be forced to remove money at 70 and I won't be subject to ordinary income tax when distributed.

Roth: "Money grows tax-deferredd and is tax-free when distributed, as long as certain criteria are met." ... that 'certain criteria' bothers me; I'm asking for a clarification.

My current tax rate is low, so being taxed on the conversion of "pre-tax assets" should not be a problem.

Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Roth: "Money grows tax-deferredd and is tax-free when distributed, as long as certain criteria are met."


Pros: You can withdraw from the Roth anything you put into it whenever you want, no penalties, no taxes, no questions other than filling out a form. It's not much more involved than taking money from your checking account. That's the contribution part. Anything you earn above what you contribute is still subject to early withdrawal penalties and such, but is totally tax free. Not tax deferred.

What's the downside? Mostly the fact that when you do the conversion you will pay all the tax up front. The IRS is still getting paid, that's why they don't care if you withdraw it later.

Purely financially the Roth vs. traditional question is more or less a tossup. I like having a Roth simply because it means I don't have to consider it as "locked-up" money. Instead of diverting funds to a taxable savings account I just stuff as much as possible to a Roth. I can get it back with no fuss or penalty in an emergency, and in the meantime get tax-free returns. That beats a savings account any day.
Posted by Fat Man
Gotta Luv Cov ... ington
Member since Jan 2006
7057 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 11:24 am to
quote:

but is totally tax free. Not tax deferred.


nice.

quote:

the conversion you will pay all the tax up front.


this needs to be my calculation.

Thanks.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 9:47 pm to
Like I said, for most people it's a tossup. But I like it since it is essentially an emergency fund with tax-free returns. With this setup you don't really need a separate emergency fund anymore, put those funds directly into the Roth instead.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26578 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

With this setup you don't really need a separate emergency fund anymore, put those funds directly into the Roth instead.


This line of thinking depends on the person. For some people, having a retirement fund that muddles with their "emergency" fund is not the best idea.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

For some people, having a retirement fund that muddles with their "emergency" fund is not the best idea.


I honestly don't get this. You don't withdraw from either unless you simply have to, and a tax-free account beats a taxable one.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26578 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:25 pm to
I agree with you. However I think many less rational folks would end up dipping into their retirement account too often if there was not a barrier, such as a penalty.
Posted by cdl2006
SCP
Member since Nov 2007
311 posts
Posted on 3/6/13 at 10:32 pm to
The distribution rules for a Roth conversion are slightly different than those of normal Roth contributions. With a conversion, there is a five year rule for it to be distributed tax free which is not the case for normal Roth contributions. My guess is this is one of the criteria he had in mind. They have some further info on this here. LINK
Posted by Fat Man
Gotta Luv Cov ... ington
Member since Jan 2006
7057 posts
Posted on 3/7/13 at 7:43 am to
quote:

, there is a five year rule for it to be distributed tax free which is not the case for normal Roth contributions.


got it. thanks.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/8/13 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

With a conversion, there is a five year rule for it to be distributed tax free which is not the case for normal Roth contributions.


Excellent point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram