Started By
Message
locked post

Romo or Roethlisberger for rest of year?

Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:57 am
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
40063 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:57 am
yahoo likes Romo more for some reason
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14639 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:57 am to
Big Ben
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19349 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:00 am to
Big Ben - easy answer
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71979 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:04 am to
Romo is going to beast coming off the bye. He has finished as a top 10 QB every year as a starter.

Big Ben is overrated. 2 top 10 finishes the past 5 years.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26615 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:11 am to
Big Ben. He has a fully loaded receiving core with Heath now becoming a top TE. Also a new OC who focuses more on the pass game, and the OL is looking real stout. This coming from a Steeler homer, but I think he'll have his best year yet.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71979 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Heath now becoming a top TE.


O RLY?

quote:

This coming from a Steeler homer


Ahhhh
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26615 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:32 am to


Yes really. He use to be just a safety valve, but now he is an integral part of the offense Jimmy Graham, Gronk, Vernon D, Tony G.(didn't mean production wise, but he is more a part of the group instead of just somebody's name to yell for the fans)
Posted by LSU-MNCBABY
Knightsgate
Member since Jan 2004
24344 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:33 am to
Big Ben by a mile.


I just dropped m Bennett for Heath miller and think it was a mistake
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71979 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:39 am to
I guess you could rely on him catching 4 TDs in 3 games, but that simply isnt reasonable.

He's 18th in catches amongst TEs, 19th in yardage, and 22nd in targets.

The cream will rise to the top while Pitta, Bennett, Miller, Rudolph will fade. They have already started declining in production.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26615 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:50 am to
quote:

I guess you could rely on him catching 4 TDs in 3 games, but that simply isnt reasonable.

He's 18th in catches amongst TEs, 19th in yardage, and 22nd in targets.

The cream will rise to the top while Pitta, Bennett, Miller, Rudolph will fade. They have already started declining in production.



Why are thinking I'm talking about starting him? I'm using his increased production this year as a reason to go all in on Big Ben.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71979 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 12:03 pm to
You said he was a "top TE", which are starters in 10 and 12 team leagues? Ya know?
Posted by TheShwenz
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2008
1381 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

He's 18th in catches amongst TEs, 19th in yardage, and 22nd in targets.


Relevant to consider he had a bye in Week 4 and they played the Eagles last week who are allowing some of the fewest fantasy points to opposing tight ends of all defenses.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26615 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 12:48 pm to
Well he is ranked 7th in standard so I guess it does make him a valuable starter. I'd put him around Pettigrew in terms of his actual production throughout the year.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 12:49 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71979 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 12:50 pm to
Im talking about going forward. He had 4 TDs in 3 games. TDs are indicative of future success.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram