- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arbery deliberations are over-- VERDICT is GUILTY
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:52 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:52 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Why do they continue to refer to him as a jogger
He was up to no good
Did he deserve to die - no
But stop that he was completely innocent in this
Accept responsibility for your actions
He was up to no good
Did he deserve to die - no
But stop that he was completely innocent in this
Accept responsibility for your actions
5
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:55 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Why do they continue to refer to him as a jogger He was up to no good
What is your proof of this?
Not your “hunch” - your proof. Be specific.
quote:
Did he deserve to die - no
Then what does it matter?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:56 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
He was up to no good
quote:
But stop that he was completely innocent in this
Accept responsibility for your actions
There hasn’t been a lick of evidence produced that he did anything wrong.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:56 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Accept responsibility for your actions
Does that mean he should’ve listened to the McMichaels?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:59 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Why do they continue to refer to him as a jogger He was up to no good Did he deserve to die - no But stop that he was completely innocent in this Accept responsibility for your actions
So this mentality is a slippery arse slope.
First, there was no evidence he was “up to no good”. Travis McMichael’s specifically said in his testimony they had no prior knowledge he committed a crime, did not see him committing a crime, and only saw him “just jogging”. They assumed he was the person who was committing burglaries in the area (no proof that he was).
In this incident, whether he has a previous record or not, yes he was innocent. The assumption that he might be a person who had broken in some houses in the area is the flimsiest fricking excuse to do what they did.
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 3:07 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Why do they continue to refer to him as a jogger
He was up to no good
Did he deserve to die - no
But stop that he was completely innocent in this
Accept responsibility for your actions
A poster in another thread made a good point about this I think. If they thought he was up to no good and wanted to chase him out of the neighborhood that wouldn't be such a bad thing. However they should have never introduced gunplay into it at all. That's where they really went over the line and it led to a shooting death and now they're fricked.
That was a pretty good assessment I thought because even if the guy was stealing stuff the penalty for theft is not death under the law
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News