- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Guns on movie sets: “Unreasonable and unrealistic” to expect actor to check load
Posted on 10/26/21 at 12:16 pm to Ag Zwin
Posted on 10/26/21 at 12:16 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:Maybe I'm arguing semantics but given that the armorer is the expert and the actor may not know the first thing about guns(red flag if you're counting on that person here) then shouldn't the armorer then be required to check it in front of the actor or even better, a 2nd person who actually knows what they're looking at?
I’ve gone out of my way to not blame him personally and make the point that, if SOP is to rely completely on the armorer, that probably needs to change and introduce a requirement that the actor check the magazine (or cylinder) and chamber in front of the armorer when it’s handed off. Two sets of eyes on a 5 second check.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News