Started By
Message

re: Prime Vick or Prime Lamar Jackson.

Posted on 9/19/21 at 11:08 pm to
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36567 posts
Posted on 9/19/21 at 11:08 pm to
this thread is INSANELY overrating michael vick which is odd because when he was playing, he got trashed constantly. this is classic rose colored glasses on a player from the past.

look, i loved michael vick, but he was incredibly inaccurate. the pure talent is insane, but so is lamar's, no? projecting how he would do in today's NFL is silly, but it's the only possible way you could pick him over lamar. there is zero evidence that he's actually better without having to resort to something like that.

do you also get zero off field issues somehow? so just a completely made-up person?
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82437 posts
Posted on 9/19/21 at 11:29 pm to
That's all like, you're opinion, man
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13848 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 1:44 am to
quote:

look, i loved michael vick, but he was incredibly inaccurate.


His completion percentage in Philly was 59.5. I don’t thinks it’s crazy with the way playcallers scheme passes today that he could easily be closer to league average. The shovel passes, slip screens, and RPOs we see so much of would be easy to inflate that. The other problem with Vick is that he didn’t study the playbook in his ATL days. He went out there to play backyard football.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram