- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Typical length of a short position ?
Posted on 9/19/08 at 11:10 am
Posted on 9/19/08 at 11:10 am
What is the typical length in time of a short position? This may be a naive analysis - but it seems to me you can't really do any long term damage to a stock by shorting it, because don't you have to close the position out fairly soon, like, in months, not years? This would mean your sale is matched by a buy order at some point a few months later - so the downward pressure on the price you exerted at one point must become an upward pressure. What are the margin requirements for shorting a stock?
What if the original owner of the stock wants to sell it? Can he demand you close the position?
What if the original owner of the stock wants to sell it? Can he demand you close the position?
This post was edited on 9/19/08 at 11:11 am
Posted on 9/19/08 at 12:31 pm to ArkansasDon
What is the typical length in time of a short position?
I've never looked at such figures, but logically it's shorter than the average long position, given there are very few true long-term, sell-and-hold bears. It's much more trade/trend oriented.
This may be a naive analysis - but it seems to me you can't really do any long term damage to a stock by shorting it, because don't you have to close the position out fairly soon, like, in months, not years?
I'm not sure that this is the reason damage is avoided. The real reason is it provides steady, balanced, downward pressure to help reduce eratic price swings.
This would mean your sale is matched by a buy order at some point a few months later
That's the problem with naked shorting--rules against naked shorting should be enforced. banning short selling altogether scares me.
- so the downward pressure on the price you exerted at one point must become an upward pressure.
yes, if the shorted shares actually existed.
What are the margin requirements for shorting a stock?
I would guess this is broker-by-broker. I'm not sure what SEC requirements are. I've shorted with as little as $2000 in my TDAmeritrade acct. I've got good credit with them--no margin calls, etc.
What if the original owner of the stock wants to sell it? Can he demand you close the position?
No.
I've never looked at such figures, but logically it's shorter than the average long position, given there are very few true long-term, sell-and-hold bears. It's much more trade/trend oriented.
This may be a naive analysis - but it seems to me you can't really do any long term damage to a stock by shorting it, because don't you have to close the position out fairly soon, like, in months, not years?
I'm not sure that this is the reason damage is avoided. The real reason is it provides steady, balanced, downward pressure to help reduce eratic price swings.
This would mean your sale is matched by a buy order at some point a few months later
That's the problem with naked shorting--rules against naked shorting should be enforced. banning short selling altogether scares me.
- so the downward pressure on the price you exerted at one point must become an upward pressure.
yes, if the shorted shares actually existed.
What are the margin requirements for shorting a stock?
I would guess this is broker-by-broker. I'm not sure what SEC requirements are. I've shorted with as little as $2000 in my TDAmeritrade acct. I've got good credit with them--no margin calls, etc.
What if the original owner of the stock wants to sell it? Can he demand you close the position?
No.
This post was edited on 9/19/08 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 9/19/08 at 1:06 pm to McLemore
I didn't realize I had to cover in any certain length of time. What are you referring to. Nobody yet has made me cover.
Posted on 9/19/08 at 1:28 pm to ArkansasDon
quote:
Typical length of a short position ?
Oh, about two inches, I'd say....
Posted on 9/19/08 at 2:23 pm to bovine1
i've never had a call to cover, but i don't short sell much. i would assume it would be under principles similar to margin calls, since you're on borrowed shares (analogous to borrowed money)
Posted on 9/20/08 at 2:16 am to McLemore
What if the person whom the shares are borrowed from has his account liquidated due to failing to meet his own margin requirements? Then what happens? Are you forced to close the short position?
Say someone with a margin account had shares of XYZ loaned out to someone else - and he wanted to sell them. He could just short the stock himself, right?
Say someone with a margin account had shares of XYZ loaned out to someone else - and he wanted to sell them. He could just short the stock himself, right?
Posted on 9/20/08 at 8:11 am to ArkansasDon
They would give his back and borrow some others I'd think but I'm just a country boy. I've shorted abit in the last yr. or 2 and this has never come up.
Popular
Back to top
2





