Started By
Message

re: So why didn’t Griff trade Zo for Lauri at the deadline?

Posted on 8/20/21 at 4:16 pm to
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4073 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

He knew Zo wasn’t going to be apart of the team moving forward and apparently the Bulls offered Lauri and picks at the deadline. Once we moved Melli, Lauri would have been a huge upgrade and provided shooting we desperately needed.

I find it hilarious we took on contracts and got scraps for Ball while the Bulls want a first for Lauri now and he couldn’t muster up any contract offers over 14 mill….


Here's a simple answer. Temple and Sato are better than Lauri.

Sato and Temple are tall role players who will fit well with Zion/BI. They are tall, they play defense, and can knock down 3's. Thus the term for such players, "3 and D."

3 and D players are valuable in todays league. They guard well, play roles, and open the floor with a few threes here and there. 3 and D's are not stars.

Lauri wants to be a star. He is not a 3 and D role player.

The End.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11977 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Temple and Sato are better than Lauri.
False
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8984 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Here's a simple answer. Temple and Sato are better than Lauri.


No they are not, put the pelicans goggles down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram