- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ivermectin is the corona killer- Joe Rogan and Doctors discuss
Posted on 7/18/21 at 8:43 pm to WeeWee
Posted on 7/18/21 at 8:43 pm to WeeWee
The argument can be made that the vaccinated cause mutations much more quickly.
The vast majority of the population should have gotten it and recovered from it naturally hence creating natural antibodies.
Or ivermectin coulda perhaps knocked its out in a few months for many, not giving the virus much time to stick around and mutate.
But you’re an MD so you know all this…
The vast majority of the population should have gotten it and recovered from it naturally hence creating natural antibodies.
Or ivermectin coulda perhaps knocked its out in a few months for many, not giving the virus much time to stick around and mutate.
But you’re an MD so you know all this…
Posted on 7/18/21 at 9:10 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
The argument can be made that the vaccinated cause mutations much more quickly.
That argument has been made and so far the scientific evidence does not back up that argument. Just like the scientific argument did not back up the fertility issue(s) claims.
quote:
The vast majority of the population should have gotten it and recovered from it naturally hence creating natural antibodies.
Even at the peak of the largest spike in daily cases the number of new cases is much lower than the number of vaccines per day. Plus the complication and mortality rate from the virus is about 100X higher than the vaccine. So it would take a lot longer to achieve herd immunity naturally and hundreds of thousands more would have died. So your argument is wrong AF.
quote:
r ivermectin coulda perhaps knocked its out in a few months for many, not giving the virus much time to stick around and mutate.
Not true at all. Do you understand the mechanism of action of Ivermectin's antiviral effects? It has been suggested (not proven or even strongly supported) that Ivermectin could stop covid replication within 72 hours. However, in order to achieve this effect it would have to be at dosages that are considered to be toxic in humans. It is not good medicine to try and treat covid with a medication that potentially result in brain damage, coma, and even brain death as a result of the neurotoxicity that the medicine has at the dosage that would have to be used. Also the way Ivermectin works would prevent a person from developing a full immune response to the infection and without the full immune response a person would not develop immunity.
The vaccine on the other hand has been shown with much stronger evidence to prevent replication in fully vaccinated individuals within minutes of an exposure and have a full immune response going by 12 hours after an exposure. Oh and there isn't the risk of giving a patient toxic dosages of a medication and having them end up brain dead.
quote:
But you’re an MD so you know all this…
and it is obvious that you are not and you do not understand wtf you are talking about.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)