re: Orgeron’s business, TAF added as Title IX lawsuit defendants

quote:

---

All that is required to prove a civil conspiracy in a case like this is that two or more people agreed to act together to achieve a result. That's it.

---

Not exactly.

quote:

---

To recover under a conspiracy theory of solidary liability, "a plaintiff must prove that an agreement existed to commit an illegal or tortious act; the act was actually committed and resulted in plaintiff's injury; and there was an agreement as to the intended outcome or result." Id. (citing Butz v. Lynch, 710 So.2d 1171 (La. Ct. App. 1998)).

---

So they'd have to prove that there was an agreement to silent these students, the silencing took place, and there was an agreement that the players would play in spite of their alleged wrongdoing.

The only claim that meets the third element is Guice, and I think that's why you saw the story change. Davis never played again, Parish never played again. That's why (unless they have proof of actual knowledge from Orgeron) I think it was dumb to bring their case forward in this manner.