Started By
Message

re: Was Bob Dole really the best the Republicans could muster in 1996?

Posted on 6/13/21 at 11:31 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69355 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 11:31 pm to
No repub was beating clinton in 1996.

The economy was hot, bill was an incredible politician who convinced a whole lot of folks that he was a "new type of democrat" aka moderate and reasonable.

Also, the country had just had an era where repubs controlled the WH for all but 4 years between 1968 and 1992.

Voters wanted to give dems some more years.

In the event of an inevitable outcome, then someone like Dole deserved to be given the nomination, as a token of gratitude for his many decades of public service.

Also.....bob dole did the best he could and actually saved quite a few gop seats in congress. the polls showed bill and the dems winning in a huge double digit landslide. clinton underperfmed the polls and that cost the dems some seats.
This post was edited on 6/13/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 7:01 am to
quote:

No repub was beating clinton in 1996.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram