- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlottesville unanimously votes to remove Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson statues
Posted on 6/12/21 at 2:25 am to L.A.
Posted on 6/12/21 at 2:25 am to L.A.
quote:I don't judge Lincoln/ others by today's standards , but I do compare them to their peers. Even Lincoln falls short compared to other politicians like Thad Stevens , Charles Sumner or more moderates like Seward or Hannibal Hamlin. I'm aware that politicians I'd vote for would have a difficult time being elected President in 1860( Salmon P Chase, Thad Stevens, Charles Sumner , etc...were considered " extremists" in 1860)
I think sugar 71 is right here. Sure, Lincoln was a pragmatist and he looked for practical solutions to the slavery issue. He wasn't woke by today's standards.
But the Republican Party was founded as an anti-slavery party, and the Confederate states started seceding as soon as Lincoln was elected. They certainly saw Lincoln as a threat to slavery. And in his heart and soul, Lincoln despised slavery.
I'd have preferred William Seward over Lincoln out of the moderates , but........ Lincoln eventually did the right thing with pressure from within his party. I believe the Emancipation Proclamation would have been issued years before & Black troops allowed to volunteer years before had Seward been President instead of Lincoln. The war may not have dragged on as long with President Seward instead of Lincoln.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News