- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: [The Athletic] What An Expanded Playoff May Look Like
Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:12 pm to Buckeye Backer
Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:12 pm to Buckeye Backer
quote:
I never stated anywhere that the G5 get auto bids. Quote me if i did?
I know you didn’t but that was one of the things that were laid out in the OP and I was mostly arguing against.
Also most years it wouldn’t be like that. BYU might be intriguing (though they did struggle against the only ranked team they played in the regular season) because you want to see how they might do versus a top P5 team. But if you look at most year’s polls, the lower rank of the top 16 teams would be 3 loss P5 teams. Like Iowa in 2019. I just don’t think a team that lost 1/4 (30% under your reduced scenario) of their games deserves to be in. That’s a significant chunk of games to lose and still be in. Especially for a sport where there’s so many give me wins already. So basically teams have to show up for 5 games a year and they’re in.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:18 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
know you didn’t but that was one of the things that were laid out in the OP and I was mostly arguing against.
Also most years it wouldn’t be like that. BYU might be intriguing (though they did struggle against the only ranked team they played in the regular season) because you want to see how they might do versus a top P5 team. But if you look at most year’s polls, the lower rank of the top 16 teams would be 3 loss P5 teams. Like Iowa in 2019. I just don’t think a team that lost 1/4 (30% under your reduced scenario) of their games deserves to be in. That’s a significant chunk of games to lose and still be in. Especially for a sport where there’s so many give me wins already. So basically teams have to show up for 5 games a year and they’re in
I dont disagree with that in totality. Yes there will be blowouts, but from an interest standpoint, it keeps the fans from those 16-25th ranked teams, interested in the season. Again, thats GOOD for college football. Nobody is arguing that a 16 would ever beat a 1...but never say never. The point is, the more teams are still engaged to try and make that top 16...the better for college football.
This post was edited on 5/7/21 at 12:20 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News