Started By
Message

re: [The Athletic] What An Expanded Playoff May Look Like

Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49447 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

but it’s even more likely to happen in CBB
A 16 over a 1? Highly doubtful
quote:

massive blowouts are more common in CFB

Which is why we're talking about just 16 not 64
quote:

Auto bids open the possibility of it happening and it should never.

Auto bids for the G5 maybe but P5 chances are extremely unlikely
quote:

They don’t care much about them

And your point? Having three at large bids in an 8 team or 11 at large in a 16 team playoff gives the G5 teams a far better chance then now
quote:

And putting in more big name teams, not G5 teams, will get them those ratings.


Obviously this is done for ratings but expansion will help the G5 teams that's not even up for debate. Cincy and UCF most likely make a 16 team playoff in the years they ran the table in the regular season
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22603 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

A 16 over a 1? Highly doubtful

Once again! A 16th seed in CBB is 64th to 68th overall seed. It’s much more likely that a top 16 team (based on the AP poll) in CBB beats a top 3 team. In CFB, the top 3 teams are usually blowing out even ranked teams.

quote:

Which is why we're talking about just 16 not 64

Blowouts are seen even with 16 teams. Because that’s my point. CBB and CFB are not similar. The gap between teams is much smaller in CBB overall.

quote:

Auto bids for the G5 maybe but P5 chances are extremely unlikely

I was referring to auto bids for the G5 teams not happening, not the P5 teams

quote:

And your point? Having three at large bids in an 8 team or 11 at large in a 16 team playoff gives the G5 teams a far better chance then now

Seriously? How do you not understand? You keep missing my point. I said 3 to 4 loss teams would get in. You said no because of G5 auto bids, and laid out a 2019 hypothetical showing no 3-4 loss teams getting.

What I’m saying is that your hypothetical is BS. They won’t go that route of G5 auto bids because in doing so would be to give G5 teams a lot of respect. So the much more likely 16 team scenario involves 3-4 loss teams getting in since there would be numerous at large bids probably based off a playoff like poll.

quote:

Obviously this is done for ratings but expansion will help the G5 teams that's not even up for debate.

I’m not debating that. I’m saying 16 teams is too much because what will happen will be 3-4 loss teams getting in. So it’s too many team that don’t deserve in. I didn’t say anything about a highly ranked G5 team getting in.
This post was edited on 5/7/21 at 12:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram