- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chauvin juror defends participation in March on Washington after social media post surface
Posted on 5/3/21 at 8:35 pm to AMS
Posted on 5/3/21 at 8:35 pm to AMS
quote:
in the appropriate context the question would be were you invited over for sex, you could truthfully answer no because you were invited for dinner whether or not you had sex.
You’re fricking up the analogy for your own shitty argument. You’ve embarrassed yourself and your mother.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 8:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
You’re fricking up the analogy for your own shitty argument. You’ve embarrassed yourself and your mother.
that's the appropriate context of the question. you are pulling a switcharoo on the question being asked and the answer given.
did you have sex, no bc the invitation was dinner is 2 different topics, when the juror's question was 1 topic.
did you participate in a protest about brutality. No bc the MLK protest is about civil rights, equality and shite altho brutality may be a subsection of civil rights.
did you go watch a game about free throws? no basketball is about scoring more points not free throws although those might help.
your mom invited me over for dinner, was the invitation for sex? no, even if sex happened the invitation was dinner.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)