- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oh look crews up with nobody on again
Posted on 3/3/21 at 4:28 pm to TheWalkoff
Posted on 3/3/21 at 4:28 pm to TheWalkoff
quote:
That’s Mainieri’s fault the first two batters of the inning got out
It kind of is. If he's dead set on Crews batting first, then he needs to move somebody with a pulse to 8-9. Let Milazzo and Thompson bat 6-7.
Arnold and Gio (upon return) would be perfect 8-9 hole options, if he wants to keep Crews batting lead off.
This post was edited on 3/3/21 at 4:29 pm
2
Posted on 3/3/21 at 4:32 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:I like this idea best. Give me the most at bats possible out of the best hitter in the nation. It seemed to work out for Dansby Swanson and Vandy
Arnold and Gio (upon return) would be perfect 8-9 hole options, if he wants to keep Crews batting lead off.
This post was edited on 3/3/21 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:23 am to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Arnold and Gio (upon return) would be perfect 8-9 hole options
Sounds great until you play a close game with the last two outs being Thompson and Milazzo.
You have to put your worst hitters somewhere, and that means a good hitter will come up with no runners because they were put out. If Crews is such a great RBI guy that you feel compelled to have runners on for him, then move him back to three. Giving more at bats to crummy hitters is NOT the answer!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News