Started By
Message

re: The White House supports studying a financial transaction tax (0.1% tax on stocks)

Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:22 am to
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16673 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Let's keep the election commentary on the poliboard.


This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75100 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me



He/she is one of the posters who voted for this type of tax

Of course he/she wants to avoid any of that talk
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36780 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:59 am to
quote:

This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me

Sure let's discuss the implications as I said I wish they'd look elsewhere and others said the market will react negatively to this happening because of the cash cost to not just smaller but larger institutions. Let's dive deeper please provide your detailed analysis.

Bitching that Dems or Republicans either one spends too much is poliboard Fodder. both parties overreach, spend too much ,and interfere with the markets unnecessarily.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram