- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is a very potent argument against the "2nd amendment means militia" talking point
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:20 pm to auggie
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:20 pm to auggie
quote:
Are you really comparing The U.S. to Iraq?
No. Jyrdis did...I answered him.
I recognize our population is far more capable than the Iraqi population.
That said, it does show that without airpower even a decently capable ground force is just a bunch of targets to a modern military force.
This post was edited on 2/16/21 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:29 pm to BornAndRaised_LA
quote:
Are you really comparing The U.S. to Iraq?
quote:
I recognize our population is far more capable than the Iraqi population.
That said, it does show that without airpower even a decently capable ground force is just a bunch of targets to a modern military force.
Lol. So even in your response to me where you acknowledged that Afghanistan had to be rooted out—and we never really did that successfully—that a decently capable ground force is actually incapable.
You’ll need to address the size of the US populace, the size of the US military and the ability for current US citizens in the military willing and able to fire on their own countrymen. As an analogy, it’s estimated only 1/3 of colonists fought against their own. Take away 1/3 of the military and you’ve created a pretty vast gap. Lastly, it’s not about the nation at that point. It’s about defending your home.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 8:32 pm to BornAndRaised_LA
quote:
That said, it does show that without airpower even a decently capable ground force is just a bunch of targets to a modern military force.
In this highly industrial country, high altitude would have some effect, but close air support wouldn't turn out all that effective. We have advantages that other countries don't. I'm going to leave it at that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News