re: NY Judge Orders Hospital To Use Ivermectin, Woman Recovers

quote:

---

A few are extremely risk averse and frankly scared of the potential side effects.

---

This would make sense in relation to the vaccine.

However, I don’t see how their objections would apply to drugs that have been around for decades with millions of doses distributed. If you had said “As it relates to malpractice litigation,” then their excuse for ignoring their Hippocratic oath may have been based in some semblance of common sense (not really because people will sue for basically anything anyway if that is their intent, but whatever).

Isn’t it ironic that the NIH just relaxed their stance on Ivermectin right before Biden was “inaugurated?” IIRC they “updated their guidelines January 14th, but didn’t make the update available to the public until the late afternoon of January 19th.

quote:

---

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has upgraded their recommendation for ivermectin, making it an option for use in treating COVID-19

---

quote:

---

“By no longer recommending against ivermectin use,” the statement said, “doctors should feel more open in prescribing ivermectin as another therapeutic option for the treatment of COVID-19.

---

quote:

---

“Ivermectin is one of the world’s safest, cheapest and most widely available drugs,” explained Dr. Kory, President of the FLCCC Alliance. “The studies we presented to the NIH revealed high levels of statistical significance showing large magnitude benefit in transmission rates, need for hospitalization, and death. What’s more, the totality of trials data supporting ivermectin is without precedent.”

---