Started By
Message

re: Capital Police Officer that was at the capital on 1/6 commits suicide.

Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:05 pm to
So why didn’t the girls who were in the elevator with flake get lit up?

Is it because he was a senator you dumbass?
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:06 pm to
Maybe he had a hard time dealing with the mother / honorable veteran being mown down in cold blood
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

So why didn’t the girls who were in the elevator with flake get lit up?

Is it because he was a senator you dumbass?

I'm not sure what you're talking about, so I won't comment on that. Were they chanting "hang Mike Pence" and telling cops that they were just trying to get to the traitors inside?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Were they chanting "hang Mike Pence" and telling cops that they were just trying to get to the traitors inside?

So police can shoot into a crowd that’s saying “kill the police.” Your rules of engagement are clearly well-thought-out.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

So police can shoot into a crowd that’s saying “kill the police.”
Are they actively trying to get to the police? If a mob is rushing after a cop while chanting "kill the police", then I am ok with shooting the first person through the window.
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:13 pm to
I linked the image of said confrontation.

Tell me why they didn’t get lit up. Confined space inside inner workings of capital building harassing flake about kavanaugh.

It really doesn’t matter what the girl was saying, she is protected by the first amendment. She was not a threat, and was shot dead.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

It really doesn’t matter what the girl was saying, she is protected by the first amendment. She was not a threat, and was shot dead.


My lord, you people are insane.
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

So police can shoot into a crowd that’s saying “kill the police.” Your rules of engagement are clearly well-thought-out.



He’s attempting to justify this murder. Then claims ignorance when faced with another situation that was more deserving of deadly force. Typical
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Are they actively trying to get to the police?


By “they” you mean the person getting shot. Otherwise, you’re just setting up another nonsense justification.

She was not “trying to get to the police.” Nor is it clear that she was “trying to get to a congressperson or do them great bodily harm.” No congressperson was in reasonable fear of great bodily harm from her. And the policeman wasn’t either.
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

My lord, you people are insane.


Wait, so the first amendment is selective?

I just need you to tell me whether or not the girls who were harassing Jeff flake should have been shot as well?
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

She was not “trying to get to the police.” Nor is it clear that she was “trying to get to a congressperson or do them great bodily harm.” No congressperson was in reasonable fear of great bodily harm from her. And the policeman wasn’t either.


I’ll go ahead and give the dumbasses response to this:

“You people are crazy!”
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

By “they” you mean the person getting shot.
Yes. By they, I mean the person getting shot.
quote:

She was not “trying to get to the police.” Nor is it clear that she was “trying to get to a congressperson or do them great bodily harm.” No congressperson was in reasonable fear of great bodily harm from her. And the policeman wasn’t either.
But they were trying to get to a congressperson. They said they were trying to get to a congressperson. They saw one pass by just 2-3 minutes earlier. They were very close.
Posted by Lincoln1
Member since Dec 2007
1509 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:21 pm to
NSFW, NSFL

LINK /

Totally non-violent Trump supporter "protesters" and "patriots" beating a policeman to death with Trump flags. Please feel welcome to continue defending that murder.

And if your defense is some Antifa conspiracy, please get lost.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

They said they were trying to get to a congressperson. They saw one pass by just 2-3 minutes earlier.


The woman said she was trying to get to a congressperson to do them great bodily harm? You have that statement on tape? Or are you starting to lose focus on “they” now?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:22 pm to
That’s not viewable without the Reddit app.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Wait, so the first amendment is selective?
There are definitely limits to the first amendment.

quote:

I just need you to tell me whether or not the girls who were harassing Jeff flake should have been shot as well?

I don't know. They probably could have.
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

But they were trying to get to a congressperson. They said they were trying to get to a congressperson. They saw one pass by just 2-3 minutes earlier. They were very close.


So the girls who had already cornered Jeff flake in the elevator deserved to be shot as well?
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

There are definitely limits to the first amendment.


Tell me what she said that would not be protected, and support that with the limits you claim there are against what she said.

quote:

I don't know. They probably could have.


Nope, doesn’t work like that. You said that the murder of this girl is justifiable. So you have to also say that these girls should have been shot right? Try to have some consistency, otherwise you look to be a hypocritical douche.
Posted by Concernednewguy7
Texas
Member since Dec 2020
1073 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

The woman said she was trying to get to a congressperson to do them great bodily harm? You have that statement on tape? Or are you starting to lose focus on “they” now?


NB4,
quote:

You people are crazy!
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:29 pm to
quote:



Nope, doesn’t work like that. You said that the murder of this girl is justifiable. So you have to also say that these girls should have been shot right? Try to have some consistency, otherwise you look to be a hypocritical douche.
All you've done is post a fricking picture.

You think THESE people just wanted to have a nice little chat?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram