- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did O want to switch to a 4-3
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:21 pm to OchoDedos
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:21 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
4-3 is antiquated against modern offenses, and due to the physical nature of players required to effectively use a 4-3, it's difficult to recruit for. HS defenses have adapted to HS spread offenses. You don't find that many high schools playing 4-3 any more.
This is my personal feeling for college ball. There are still a number of NFL teams running a 4-3 because they still have to defend the run a lot and the defensive secondaries are elite compared to college teams even on the bad NFL teams.
Aranda liked to run 2 big DL, 6 LBs, 2 CB's, and one deep safety. He did this to put the fastest athletes on the field he could against spread teams. When we went against strong run teams then he would go traditional 3 big DL...
Look at the players we put on the field last season:
Chaison
Queen
Phillips
Divinity
Delpit
Vincent
Stingley
Stevens
Fulton
All these guys had great range and all but KF, KV, and Sting were some sort of hybrid LB in function.
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:25 pm to GetmorewithLes
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News