- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1031 Exchange Question
Posted on 12/17/20 at 5:11 pm to HBomb
Posted on 12/17/20 at 5:11 pm to HBomb
You got two issues.
1) If it becomes personal property, how do you get the 121 home sale exclusion (since your gain will be higher due to the deferred gain from the 1031 exchange).
2) How do you prevent the IRS from applying step doctrine and blowing up the 1031 exchange and forcing you to pay the tax on the gain in the exchange year (and this may happen on audit several years later).
In order to take advantage of the Sec 121 home sale exclusion, you have to hold the new property for 5 full years (in addition to having it be your personal residence for 2 years of those 5).
To make sure the IRS doesn't toss out the original 1031 exchange deferral, You have to prove that you intended to keep the new property as investment, but that situations changed after you acquired the replacement property.
There is a safe harbor available, the IRS won't toss the original 1031...
1) You have to own the replacement property for at least 24 months
2) divide that 24 month period into two equal 12 month periods
3) you must rent out the house for at least 14 days, at a fair market rent, during each period
4) your personal use can't exceed the greater of a) 14 days or b) 10 percent of the rental days, during each period.
If you fail the safe harbor, then you can try to argue facts and circumstances and intent at the IRS. There are no guarantees there.
I think your CPA has a right to be concerned, if you were my client, I would probably have you sign something saying your intention was to keep it as investment property. That's to protect me, by the way, not you =)
1) If it becomes personal property, how do you get the 121 home sale exclusion (since your gain will be higher due to the deferred gain from the 1031 exchange).
2) How do you prevent the IRS from applying step doctrine and blowing up the 1031 exchange and forcing you to pay the tax on the gain in the exchange year (and this may happen on audit several years later).
In order to take advantage of the Sec 121 home sale exclusion, you have to hold the new property for 5 full years (in addition to having it be your personal residence for 2 years of those 5).
To make sure the IRS doesn't toss out the original 1031 exchange deferral, You have to prove that you intended to keep the new property as investment, but that situations changed after you acquired the replacement property.
There is a safe harbor available, the IRS won't toss the original 1031...
1) You have to own the replacement property for at least 24 months
2) divide that 24 month period into two equal 12 month periods
3) you must rent out the house for at least 14 days, at a fair market rent, during each period
4) your personal use can't exceed the greater of a) 14 days or b) 10 percent of the rental days, during each period.
If you fail the safe harbor, then you can try to argue facts and circumstances and intent at the IRS. There are no guarantees there.
I think your CPA has a right to be concerned, if you were my client, I would probably have you sign something saying your intention was to keep it as investment property. That's to protect me, by the way, not you =)
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:38 pm to LSUFanHouston
I've been studying 1031s for years and almost did one on a recent sale. I decided it just didn't fit my circumstances (it is an absurdly and irrationally restrictive rule, as are many exclusions and deferral rules). And I didn't want to invite audits. The scheme I had in mind was legal, but some aspects were backed by only letter rulings.
Anyway, one thing I pondered a lot was, is the IRS really going to go through a shite ton of investigation on a dinky transaction like this? Trying to determine subjective intent from circumstances, the substantiation of which is easily manipulated and fabricated.
Probably. They go after wait staff, so why not mom and pop for selling a modest rental home?
Anyway, one thing I pondered a lot was, is the IRS really going to go through a shite ton of investigation on a dinky transaction like this? Trying to determine subjective intent from circumstances, the substantiation of which is easily manipulated and fabricated.
Probably. They go after wait staff, so why not mom and pop for selling a modest rental home?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News