re: There's a petition to kick Amber Heard off ‘Aquaman 2’

Well he filed a defamation suit and UK libel laws put the burden on The Sun.

LINK

quote:

---

Second, the law. British libel law works differently from the American version. In short, in the United States, the burden of proof for libel is on the person claiming to have been libeled — that is, the plaintiff has to demonstrate that what was written is false (at least in cases involving matters of public concern). In the United Kingdom, the burden of proof is on the party accused of libel — that is, The Sun had to prove that what it published about Depp was true. A judge held that it had met that burden and that 12 of 14 of Heard's accusations of abuse met the threshold for truth in civil court. Depp's attorneys say they plan to appeal. (Depp is also suing Heard for defamation in a U.S. court after she published an op-ed in The Washington Post identifying herself as a survivor of sexual and physical violence.)

---

Sorry you disagree, but I'm going with the court instead of your opinion.

I will say they're both dirtbag people who shouldn't have fans. So I don't know why people so strongly support either of them.