- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump lost Pennsylvania Monday
Posted on 10/20/20 at 7:39 am to SEC. 593
Posted on 10/20/20 at 7:39 am to SEC. 593
quote:
No, it takes an agreement of four justices to hear a case.
However, this wouldn't be a new case but a motion on an existing case, so ACB wouldn't be involved since she wasn't seated for oral arguments.
Were there oral arguments in this case?
I thought that it was 4-4 to NOT HEAR the case at all. BUT, four wanted to actually hear the case. I could be mistaken.
In any event, my question still stands -- can the Republicans ask for a Motion for Reconsideration on HEARING THE CASE when ACB is seated?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News