Started By
Message

re: When did the term “Sexual Preference” become offensive?

Posted on 10/14/20 at 10:46 am to
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
74230 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 10:46 am to
Lib/Prog filth hate individual choice and responsibility.
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10504 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 10:47 am to
If this stuff doesn’t scare the absolute shite out of you, then you aren’t paying attention.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 10:52 am to
quote:

It’s not offensive, stop letting them manipulate language to fit their narrative
That hurt my feelings.
Posted by Swamp Angel
Georgia
Member since Jul 2004
7855 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 10:56 am to
quote:

When did the term “Sexual Preference” become offensive?


Wanna REALLY see these folks have a stroke? Tell them that although you're not a fan of their lifestyle, you believe it is their individual right to live as they desire. The word "lifestyle" sends them right out of their heads!
Posted by bizeagle
Member since May 2020
1225 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:00 am to
Would not have mattered what ACB said, Mazie Hirono would have attacked ACB anyway. Hirono was reading from notes and had a prepared response for almost any potential answer that ACB could give.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
12036 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

When did the term “Sexual Preference” become offensive?


When they stopped using science to determine gender.

Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
21788 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:25 pm to
They also added this example of usage to the definition on Webster's website:

quote:

Usage of Preference
The term preference as used to refer to sexual orientation is widely considered offensive in its implied suggestion that a person can choose who they are sexually or romantically attracted to.


This post was edited on 10/14/20 at 12:26 pm
Posted by EveryonesACoach
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
869 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 12:44 pm to
Heard this bit of nonsense on NYT's "The Daily" podcast this morning. Rich coming from a show whose host was married to another dude for years, but is now divorced and dating a woman.
This post was edited on 10/14/20 at 12:47 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432453 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
106113 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Those terms are not mutually exclusive. Zach is "naturally wired" to be a hetero. That is why he has a 'preference' for females. It's simple logic.



Sane people get this Zach, but again, this is their reason.

The dems never make much sense
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram