- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why Not Anarchy?
Posted on 10/2/20 at 1:39 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 10/2/20 at 1:39 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Yes
No.
quote:
Who do you think paid the mercenaries?
The people who wanted to be defended.
quote:
There will never be “less government”. It only expands.
Yes, but in logic this is called 'should/would' fallacy.
IE...'Women should not be allowed to vote.'
A rebuttal of 'that won't happen' is irrelevant. Do you understand?
quote:
And they would be wrong.
They would be right.
1
Posted on 10/2/20 at 2:38 pm to Zach
quote:
The people who wanted to be defended.
You mean governments. Because private citizens have not commanded mercenary armies in any relevant context for an incredibly long time, and they cannot afford it now.
quote:
They would be right.
No they wouldn’t. The US in 1776 factually was not governed under any type of anarchist principles. Federalism is not anarchy. How stupid modern pseudo-intellectuals feel about the past is not relevant. It wasn’t anarchy, period.
This post was edited on 10/2/20 at 2:40 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News