Started By
Message

re: Isn’t Medicaid essentially Universal Healthcare for poor folks

Posted on 9/28/20 at 7:35 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111803 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 7:35 pm to
Medicaid sucks.
Medicare is supposedly awesome.

No one would get behind a “Medicaid for all” plan. So they pretend it would be “Medicare for all.”

But reimbursement would go off a cliff. Provider participation would crater.

And presto. You’ve got Medicaid for all.
Posted by Manlaw35
Member since Jan 2013
1302 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Medicaid sucks.
Medicare is supposedly awesome.

No one would get behind a “Medicaid for all” plan. So they pretend it would be “Medicare for all.”

But reimbursement would go off a cliff. Provider participation would crater.

And presto. You’ve got Medicaid for all.



Good point. It probably would become Medicaid, which does suck.
However, Medicare is not awesome but it's better than Medicaid.
This post was edited on 9/28/20 at 7:39 pm
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

No one would get behind a “Medicaid for all” plan. So they pretend it would be “Medicare for all.”

But reimbursement would go off a cliff. Provider participation would crater.

And presto. You’ve got Medicaid for all.


Best I can tell advocates are absolutely sincere about wanting the payments on the Medicare fee schedule. But most hospitals can't survive on the commercial rate for Medicare trade and you'll end up with the provider participation issue you describe. I don't think it ever gets to Medicaid for all. It fails when hospitals close all over the country in towns and small cities.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram