Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

#MuhHatchAct: Today's Mockingbird Talking Point

Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:00 am
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74694 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:00 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103094 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:01 am to
Was it a Hatch Act violation for Obama to do pressers with actors in lab coats to push Obamacare?
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55400 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:02 am to
Is this another situation where the left wants certain laws enacted for their enemies but not for them?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74694 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Was it a Hatch Act violation for Obama to do pressers with actors in lab coats to push Obamacare?


POTUS & VPOTUS are exempt.



https://www.doi.gov/ethics/prohibited-partisan-political-activity-reminder-required-hatch-act#:~:text=The%20Hatch%20Act%20generally%20prohibits,while%20using%20a%20Government%20vehicle.
Posted by LeroooyJenkins
Member since Nov 2017
1058 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:03 am to
at libs talking about funneling tax dollars. Those child rapers wrote the book on doing that
Posted by 3rdPart Tiger
Member since Oct 2007
6581 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Except for the President and Vice President, all federal civilian executive branch employees are covered by the Hatch Act, including employees of the U.S. Postal Service.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74694 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Is this another situation where the left wants certain laws enacted for their enemies but not for them?



Enacted? No. It's been on the books for over 80 years.



Enforced? Absolutely.

Remember, Biden, Hussein, Rice, Clapper, Yates, Brennan, Comey, et. al. held a meeting in Jan. 2017 in an effort to determine the viability of prosecuting Gen. Flynn on the Logan Act, a statute on the books since 1799 but never successfully prosecuted.
Posted by Tigers0891
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2017
7066 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:09 am to
Crickets from these folks on the post office union endorsement. TDS
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74694 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:14 am to
Technically, I believe that the Postal Workers' Union itself isn't made of federal employees. It's a loophole, to be sure.
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21476 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:21 am to
He can't keep getting away with this!!!
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11355 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:21 am to
quote:

including employees of the U.S. Postal Service.


Would this include postal workers wearing a vest that says APWU while working?

APWU = American Postal Workers Union
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:

all federal civilian executive branch employees are covered by the Hatch Act, including employees of the U.S. Postal Service


The why is the postal union allowed to officially endorse a candidate?
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:25 am to
quote:


Technically, I believe that the Postal Workers' Union itself isn't made of federal employees. It's a loophole, to be sure


So..... the postal workers union isn’t made of postal workers???
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74694 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 9:29 am to
quote:

the postal workers union isn’t made of postal workers???


No, but those who work for the union proper (which is the body making the endorsement) is made of private sector individuals, and what can be assumed are former federal employees aka Postal Workers.

Again - loophole/technicality
Posted by Steadmans Cheddar
Member since Dec 2019
1347 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 10:50 am to
quote:

The why is the postal union allowed to officially endorse a candidate?


Because the union is a separate legal entity that is not employed by the federal government.

Same with the Border Patrol Union endorsing Trump. Not a violation.
This post was edited on 8/5/20 at 10:52 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/5/20 at 11:04 am to
I don't know that giving a political party acceptance speech from the White House would violate the Hatch Act, but it would indeed be very bad form ... in that it would further blur the distinction between "President as leader of our country" and "Individual as leader of his political party."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram