- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NEW A-11 Offensive Scheme
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:42 pm
4
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:46 pm to TexanTiger3
Yeah I saw that earlier, that's crazy.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:46 pm to TexanTiger3
I was just about to post this. We could learn a few of these plays this year with the QB's, receivers and tight ends we have...
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:49 pm to BrutalBengal
I worry more about it used AGAINST us... it might make our defensive line advantage obsolete (to a degree). All you have to do is audible the 'take' and send whoever lines up against the "big boys".
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:50 pm to TexanTiger3
quote:
I worry more about it used AGAINST us... it might make our defensive line advantage obsolete (to a degree). All you have to do is audible the 'take' and send whoever lines up against the "big boys".
I think getting to the QB's quickly is what defending that O has to be all about.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:51 pm to TexanTiger3
Terrelle Pryor fits perfectly for this system. 
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:51 pm to BrutalBengal
The Germans created it.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 8:54 pm to BrutalBengal
quote:
I think getting to the QB's quickly is what defending that O has to be all about.
It is, but hard to do when you're spread out so thin across the field. I could definitely see the wizard stirring this into the pot.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 9:17 pm to TexanTiger3
Several things to consider:
1. The defense had everyone covered – usually the receiver down field had two defenders.
2. They made the playoffs for three years, which I’m guessing made them in the top 16+ teams – but no championships.
3. Most of their gains looked like the result of bad tackling – not brilliant maneuvers.
4. If my memory serves me, we have stuffed it every time it was tried against us.
5. I noticed that every play seemed slow to develop because the spread of the offense.
6. We have won two NMs lately without using it.
Sorry guys – I just think this should be left in High School, grasping programs, and the sandlots.
1. The defense had everyone covered – usually the receiver down field had two defenders.
2. They made the playoffs for three years, which I’m guessing made them in the top 16+ teams – but no championships.
3. Most of their gains looked like the result of bad tackling – not brilliant maneuvers.
4. If my memory serves me, we have stuffed it every time it was tried against us.
5. I noticed that every play seemed slow to develop because the spread of the offense.
6. We have won two NMs lately without using it.
Sorry guys – I just think this should be left in High School, grasping programs, and the sandlots.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 9:24 pm to Pietra
Looks like flag football to me.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 9:26 pm to Pietra
Yea leave that in high school. Florida tried it last year and Tebow got sacked on the play. All it really does is stretch out the "lineman" because most of the "recievers" arent eligible. If they release its a screen/running play. Its seems rather easy to me to shut down.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 9:32 pm to royals
Yeah it looks pretty bad from their highlight video. It only showed catches that were made right next to a defender or jump balls. I didn't notice anyone wide open or anything.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 9:55 pm to royals
The only way I can see this type of defense being exceptional is if you have a QB that can break tackles, like Tebow, or one with RB type agility.
If you have a QB that can make guys miss or break a tackle, it would be tough to defend both the QBs and all the WRs.
Otherwise, its a very pedestrian offense if the other team has at least two good pass rushing DL while the rest of the team drops into a zone.
If you have a QB that can make guys miss or break a tackle, it would be tough to defend both the QBs and all the WRs.
Otherwise, its a very pedestrian offense if the other team has at least two good pass rushing DL while the rest of the team drops into a zone.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 10:38 pm to TexanTiger3
Thats they same play that Florida ran against us. It was busted up, but if tebow would have looked to the swinging gate side, it woulda been six for the gators.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 10:41 pm to ohiosportfan777
quote:
Terrelle Pryor
Posted on 7/24/08 at 10:42 pm to saderade
quote:
Looks like arena football to me
fixed
Posted on 7/24/08 at 11:19 pm to VooDoo1321
qb wouldnt last long in the sec with this .. just my O.
Posted on 7/24/08 at 11:48 pm to Pietra
my initial thoughts were so on point w/your point number 1....everyone was freaking covered.....how about someone making a play!!!
Posted on 7/25/08 at 12:06 am to TigerTreyjpg
Everyone keeps saying that was used against us when we played Florida. Can someone give me a clip of that??!!!? I dont remember anyone ever using tha texact formation against us. If you are going to downplay the formation and say we stufed it, show some proof. I doubt you are correct.
Posted on 7/25/08 at 1:25 am to lsutgrad2007
quote:
Everyone keeps saying that was used against us when we played Florida. Can someone give me a clip of that??!!!? I dont remember anyone ever using tha texact formation against us. If you are going to downplay the formation and say we stufed it, show some proof. I doubt you are correct.
LINK
Not really the exact same thing as there was only one QB
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News