Started By
Message

re: MLB owners should cancel season

Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41776 posts
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

A March 26 conversation between MLB and the union in which MLB portrays the union as acknowledging that a new negotiation was needed regarding how players would be paid this season could serve as an email version of a smoking gun.


quote:



The Post, however, has obtained a March 26 email from an MLB lawyer to top league officials that documents the substance of talks between two MLB officials and two MLBPA officials from earlier that morning. The email covers seven points, including that MLB explained to the union officials that MLB would need a second negotiation if games were not played in front of fans to determine pay and claims that union officials understood that concept.

Thus, the email seemingly offers evidence that the union was aware that further talks were potentially necessary.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
33013 posts
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:12 pm to
quote:



The Post, however, has obtained a March 26 email from an MLB lawyer to top league officials that documents the substance of talks between two MLB officials and two MLBPA officials from earlier that morning. The email covers seven points, including that MLB explained to the union officials that MLB would need a second negotiation if games were not played in front of fans to determine pay and claims that union officials understood that concept.

Thus, the email seemingly offers evidence that the union was aware that further talks were potentially necessary.



This is not a surprise. I had significant trouble believing that a group of billionaires had a set in stone agreement that lacked the foresight of reduced crowds.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
96657 posts
Posted on 5/31/20 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

The email covers seven points, including that MLB explained to the union officials that MLB would need a second negotiation if games were not played in front of fans to determine pay and claims that union officials understood that concept.

Thus, the email seemingly offers evidence that the union was aware that further talks were potentially necessary.



bUt ThE oWnErS bAcKeD oUt oF wHaT tHeY aGrEeD tO! tHeY'rE aCtInG iN bAd FaItH!!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram