- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Destroya: EVERY restaurant customer will be required to give their name and phone number
Posted on 5/16/20 at 12:01 pm to Stadium Rat
Posted on 5/16/20 at 12:01 pm to Stadium Rat
quote:
They will interview those people and find out where they've been.
The lists are to facilitate tracing of contacts, and restaurants will be hot spots of contacts. If we had widespread testing, the need for tracing would be lessened, but it will be a while before the testing ramps up sufficiently.
It just seems like something that may sound good in theory to someone, but it is a lot of work for very little reward. It takes up to 14 days to show symptoms, and we're asking someone sick with covid to give dates/places accurately. Then we're expecting some random local government employee to sit down with lists and call people based on whatever they wrote down? And expecting people who went out knowing their risks to listen to a self quarantine order when they possibly weren't even exposed to said sick person?
And what about the myriad of other places the sick person may have been in the past 14 days? The gas station, Home Depot, grocery store, etc. don't have lists to call.
It seems like an immense burden being places on struggling restaurants and a waste of money/time for something that might help a couple people.
Also, forgive my ignorance but is there still an issue with tests not being available? I havn't heard that being said in a while, so genuinely asking.
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 5/16/20 at 12:58 pm to LouisianaLady
Any person they can warn that may have been exposed is potentially one or more lives saved. It doesn't have to be perfect. If you went out, wouldn't you want to know if you came into contact with someone with COVID 19?
I don't see this being a huge burden on anyone. People are already giving this information when they make a reservation. Think of it as mandatory reservations.
I don't see this being a huge burden on anyone. People are already giving this information when they make a reservation. Think of it as mandatory reservations.
quote:Testing right now is woefully inadequate. In comparison, China just announced they are going to make testing available to everyone in the province. Testing needs to be as easy, cheap and available as say, a pregnancy test. Then we can really open full blast, even without a vaccine.
Also, forgive my ignorance but is there still an issue with tests not being available? I haven't heard that being said in a while, so genuinely asking.
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 5/16/20 at 6:26 pm to LouisianaLady
quote:
Also, forgive my ignorance but is there still an issue with tests not being available?
I’m in on the excuse my ignorance about everyone getting tested.
Is it in case you test positive but have no symptoms that they want you to know so you can take safeguards
or
Is it the more positive cases the more bailout money cites and states will receive?
Even if I have no symptoms or am not in a high risk category I should be tested?
I’m just not grasping this.
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 10:53 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)