- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 4/23/20 at 6:21 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The decision does not overturn OR uphold the statute. It simply applies the statute.
So you read it anyway. Good for you.
This post was edited on 4/23/20 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 4/23/20 at 6:27 pm to AggieHank86
I think he’s saying that if Hillary had appointed two justices, they would’ve joined the other four and the decision would’ve been markedly different.
If the present dissent was to overturn, it would’ve been hypothetically overturned. If the present dissent was to not apply the law, the hypothetical majority would’ve been that it didn’t apply.
If the present dissent was to overturn, it would’ve been hypothetically overturned. If the present dissent was to not apply the law, the hypothetical majority would’ve been that it didn’t apply.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 7:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The decision does not overturn OR uphold the statute. It simply applies the statute.
And? Are you implying that five liberal justices would not have found a way to simply IGNORE the statute and allow the alien to prevent his deportation?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News