- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do moderate dems claim a public option health plan could coexist with private plans?
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:08 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:08 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
A public plan by itself would not eliminate private insurers. The feds would have to make private insurance illegal for that to happen.
The main problem with the OPs reasoning is that he incorrectly assumes private plans still pay providers significantly more than Medicare. I do not take Aetna in my area because they pay 89% of Medicare’s fee schedule. None of the Medicare Advantage plans (run by private insurers) have fee schedules equal to Medicare. They all pay less than Medicare. BCBS is the only network which still pays me significantly more than Medicare and it’s only 120% of what Medicare would pay. I can count on one finger the number of primary care physicians who refer to me and don’t take Medicare.
Basically, I make around 110% of what Medicare would pay for a given patient encounter, on average. It’s a race to the bottom and physicians are either accepting the terms because we are an incredibly disorganized profession...or folks are going to work for their local healthcare/hospital megacorp where they don’t care about fee schedules as it doesn’t affect their pay directly.
Medicaid is another story. Those rates are criminally low. I am not a medicaid provider in my state. And I refuse medicaid consults in the hospital.
The main problem with the OPs reasoning is that he incorrectly assumes private plans still pay providers significantly more than Medicare. I do not take Aetna in my area because they pay 89% of Medicare’s fee schedule. None of the Medicare Advantage plans (run by private insurers) have fee schedules equal to Medicare. They all pay less than Medicare. BCBS is the only network which still pays me significantly more than Medicare and it’s only 120% of what Medicare would pay. I can count on one finger the number of primary care physicians who refer to me and don’t take Medicare.
Basically, I make around 110% of what Medicare would pay for a given patient encounter, on average. It’s a race to the bottom and physicians are either accepting the terms because we are an incredibly disorganized profession...or folks are going to work for their local healthcare/hospital megacorp where they don’t care about fee schedules as it doesn’t affect their pay directly.
Medicaid is another story. Those rates are criminally low. I am not a medicaid provider in my state. And I refuse medicaid consults in the hospital.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 11:29 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News