Started By
Message

re: Why do moderate dems claim a public option health plan could coexist with private plans?

Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:08 am to
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3645 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:08 am to
A public plan by itself would not eliminate private insurers. The feds would have to make private insurance illegal for that to happen.

The main problem with the OPs reasoning is that he incorrectly assumes private plans still pay providers significantly more than Medicare. I do not take Aetna in my area because they pay 89% of Medicare’s fee schedule. None of the Medicare Advantage plans (run by private insurers) have fee schedules equal to Medicare. They all pay less than Medicare. BCBS is the only network which still pays me significantly more than Medicare and it’s only 120% of what Medicare would pay. I can count on one finger the number of primary care physicians who refer to me and don’t take Medicare.

Basically, I make around 110% of what Medicare would pay for a given patient encounter, on average. It’s a race to the bottom and physicians are either accepting the terms because we are an incredibly disorganized profession...or folks are going to work for their local healthcare/hospital megacorp where they don’t care about fee schedules as it doesn’t affect their pay directly.

Medicaid is another story. Those rates are criminally low. I am not a medicaid provider in my state. And I refuse medicaid consults in the hospital.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 11:29 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram