Started By
Message

re: COVID19 mortality rate now over 5 percent

Posted on 4/16/20 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 4/16/20 at 4:36 pm to
quote:


And disregard basic math.


Again, not really here for the meat of the argument, but what basic math is being disregarded?
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 4/16/20 at 4:40 pm to
not exactly magas finest moment to see how many of you cant even do 3rd grade math

Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
11868 posts
Posted on 4/16/20 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Again, not really here for the meat of the argument, but what basic math is being disregarded?


It’s interesting that the anti-hydroxychloroquine all want to cry “small sample size!!!! Whah whah waaahhh!!!”

Yet, when using calculating the mortality rate, they are perfectly okay with calculating with incomplete numbers. We have no idea how many people have been infected, therefore we have no way of calculating the mortality rate.

Additionally, this virus obviously affects people differently depending on pre-existing respiratory conditions. So when describing the impact of the virus on our society, it is woefully misleading to calculate a single mortality rate. The reason for this is because the biased data being used.

Biased data calculations caused biased information generated from that biased calculation.

Yes, 2+3=5. So, in that aspect, the math is syntactically correct.

However, when you take data and then use it as a source of information, your calculations are now incorrect because of the biased nature.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram