Started By
Message

re: Copperhead Snake Birthing Season Is Here

Posted on 4/9/20 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by Outdoorreb
Member since Oct 2019
2568 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 1:48 pm to
Is that the reason, or is it because majority of the time it isn’t needed? (I wouldn’t know anything about the insurance side)
I have never been bitten, but I remember in Herp. we were taught that copperheads bites very rarely (almost never) killed people and that they mostly were treated with just antibiotics and pain relievers.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6823 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

If treated w/ antivenom, the insurance company may not pay for it.


Insurance companies aren't necessarily an evil entity; they're clearly a vital cog in our health care system. OTOH, they frequently deny payment to MD's and hospitals for services rendered in good faith. It's not unheard of for an insurance company to deny payment for anti-venin (a very expensive pharmaceutical) for a copperhead bite. Why do they refuse? Who knows since they don't have to cite a reason. The hospital may ultimately win after multiple appeals but will spend a lot of time and resources doing so. You're correct that copperhead venom is generally not as deadly as other venomous snakes and rarely fatal. Nevertheless, there are still significant potential non-fatal complications for the victim.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram