Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus price gouger stuck with 18,000 bottles of sanitizers after Amazon bans him

Posted on 3/14/20 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36447 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

So a company figures out how to produce the cure for cancer to an individual at a cost of $100 and they charge $100,000 for it - that isn’t evil?

That company wouldn't exist for long. The latter price removes the overwhelming majority of potential customers from the market. So while a very small percentage may pay the $100,000, the lost profits from those who can't pay are greater than the one's you're making, which causes an adjustment to the price more in line with the former.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

That company wouldn't exist for long.


They'd still hold the patent. Or are you arguing against those, as well?

Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10521 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

That company wouldn't exist for long. The latter price removes the overwhelming majority of potential customers from the market. So while a very small percentage may pay the $100,000, the lost profits from those who can't pay are greater than the one's you're making, which causes an adjustment to the price more in line with the former.


You sure? How many people own homes in this country. How many people have loved ones who own homes? Everyone who does is taking out a second mortgage to cure their cancer or a loved ones. They wouldn’t be short of customers at all, and at those margins it wouldn’t make sense from a purely capitalist standpoint to lower prices just to reach a broader audience.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram