- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: fricking ambulance chasers lose election, still win
Posted on 2/16/20 at 9:58 am to udtiger
Posted on 2/16/20 at 9:58 am to udtiger
He should not be recused. Does anyone think Liljeburg would have recused himself from these cases as well, having been overwhelmingly supported by the plaintiff bar ilk? Not a chance. As an attorney you run that risk when you get involved in judicial races. You have to be prepared that your horse might lose and you will be stuck with a winner you were publicly opposed to. This is bullshite and simply the scumbags, being the democrats/RINOs they are, trying to undo an election.
This post was edited on 2/16/20 at 10:09 am
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:00 am to DevilDagNS
quote:
He should not recuse himself
He didn't.
A majority of the other SC justices forcibly recused him.
And you are correct. Liljberg would have been bought and paid for and not forced off.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:27 am to DevilDagNS
You have to be prepared that your horse might lose and you will be stuck with a winner you were publicly opposed to. This is bullshite and simply the scumbags, being the democrats/RINOs they are, trying to undo an election.
BOOM! Well stated.
BOOM! Well stated.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News