- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crowd photo at March for Life
Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:29 pm to DarthRebel
Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:29 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
So you are for murdering babies, interesting.
No I’m not, I disagree that it’s murder and I think the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor, there no place at all for the government. I also disagree with the idea that they are "babies", at least not at first.
It’s a tough and excruciating thing to go through and even though it’s painted as such it’s not always due to convenience. If a woman’s life is in danger there’s no reason whatsoever she shouldn’t be allowed to save herself. Talk about government overreach. The laws where she has to hear the heartbeat or listen to the doc say certain scripted things to shame her is ridiculous. I don’t see how anyone could say they are for small government but at the same time think that the government needs to step in and make medical decisions for a woman.
5
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
I think the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor,
What about the father?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:15 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:it is and you're wrong. it's convenience murder. i don't want the baby. throw it in the trash. whatever. just don't give it up for adoption. i would rather it be treated worse than we treat animals
I disagree that it’s murder
quote:who made them the moral authorities? no one.
the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor,
quote:well then you're just stupid and you really can't be helped
I also disagree with the idea that they are "babies"
quote:oh please. stop it. no one is arguing these cases. the question is the 95% of abortions where the mom can't be bothered with motherhood
If a woman’s life is in danger
quote:yeah we wouldn't want to defend the life of the baby now would we
The laws where she has to hear the heartbeat or listen to the doc say certain scripted things to shame her is ridiculous
quote:this is not a medical decision genius. it's a moral decision. the baby's right to life. i realize that's too complicated for you to understand.
make medical decisions for a woman
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:14 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
If a woman’s life is in danger there’s no reason whatsoever she shouldn’t be allowed to save herself.
this is a complete strawman. No sane person argues this.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:15 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
woman and her doctor
Yeah frick the father's opinion
My body my choice my arse
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:03 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
I don’t see how anyone could say they are for small government but at the same time think that the government needs to step in and make medical decisions for a woman.
The pro-life argument isn’t the above. It’s that the government, as laid out in the constitution, should protect all life.
quote:
If a woman’s life is in danger there’s no reason whatsoever she shouldn’t be allowed to save herself.
As I’ve said before many times on here. My best friend is one of the most respected Fetal Maternal Medicine physicians in the country. If the woman’s life is in such danger, they’ll perform an emergency cesarian section and both will live.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News